Thread: 168 v. 169
View Single Post
Old 03-28-2008, 08:41 AM   #2 (permalink)
trollydolly trollydolly is offline
Established Member
Member
 
trollydolly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Essex, UK
My Mood:
iTrader: (2)
trollydolly wants you to show them some love!trollydolly wants you to show them some love!trollydolly wants you to show them some love!trollydolly wants you to show them some love!trollydolly wants you to show them some love!trollydolly wants you to show them some love!trollydolly wants you to show them some love!
Thanks: 480
Thanked 241 Times in 90 Posts


 
Re: 168 v. 169
i own both the 168 and 169 and love them both. i use 168 for blush and the 169 for contouring. the 168 has got a fuller 'head' and is better for the application of blush and i find that the 169 is great for contouring because it is narrower. i tried using the 169 for blush a few weeks ago and it went a bit streaky. i think that overall the 168 is more versitile because its fantastic for either blush or contouring. hope this helps!

__________________






Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to trollydolly For This Useful Post: