#168 or #169 ???

MisaMayah · 12-26-2007, 02:51 PM #1 (**permalink**)

I'm stuck!!

I need a new angled face brush and can't decide whether to get the #168 or #169. I know #169 is LE and synthetic..does anyone have both or can compare both for me?? Any info from you guys will help me decide which one to go for!!

Thank you

glam8babe · 12-26-2007, 05:25 PM #2 (**permalink**)

i tyhink u shud get the 169.. mostly because its LE and it might not come out again.. or for a while for that matter.
and if you dont like it that much u cud always get the 168 at the store/counter anytime

Kiseki · 12-26-2007, 05:47 PM #3 (**permalink**)

I like the 169 a lot and I'm glad it's out again (wasn't it a part of the Raquel Welch Icon collection?), so that's what I'd get.

MisaMayah · 12-27-2007, 01:18 PM #4 (**permalink**)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiseki

I like the 169 a lot and I'm glad it's out again (wasn't it a part of the Raquel Welch Icon collection?), so that's what I'd get.

Yes it was apart of the Raquel colection! It looks gorgeous I just wanted to know what the differences were between the two.

That's true GLAMBABE I can alwaya get the 168 if I dont like the 169!!

Thanks

If anyone knows any differences please let me know!

MisaMayah · 12-27-2007, 01:19 PM #5 (**permalink**)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiseki

I like the 169 a lot and I'm glad it's out again (wasn't it a part of the Raquel Welch Icon collection?), so that's what I'd get.

Sorry I forgot to ask! What are the bristles like? Are they really soft? And about how big is it??

Kiseki · 12-28-2007, 06:15 PM #6 (**permalink**)

They're softer and overall the brush is bigger, fluffier and better for contouring, at least for me.

nunu · 12-29-2007, 07:58 AM #7 (**permalink**)

I think you should go for the 169, like glam8babe said if you don't like it you can get the 168 coz it's part of the permanent collection

I already have the 168 and i like it for contouring and applying msf's