 |
Recommendations Need a recommendation for something? Have a big event coming up? New to the cosmetic world? Ask the experts* in the recommendations forum!
*everyone may participate, expert does not imply professional makeup artists. |
|
View Poll Results: Which brush do I buy?
|
|
#187 stippling brush
|
 
|
18 |
90.00% |
|
#180 kabuki buffing brush
|
 
|
2 |
10.00% |
|
|
|
Specktra Senior
Contributing Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Thanks: 0
Thanked 61 Times in 53 Posts
|
180 or 187?
which one is better? the 180 looks like it has better control. they basically do the same thing right?
|
|
|
|
|
Sitting Pretty.
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Massachusetts - USA.
Thanks: 0
Thanked 48 Times in 43 Posts
|
187 is my favorite. 180 is used for buffing after applying makeup to remove excess or cake-ey powder. 187 is very versatile, and can be used for MSFs, CCBs, Bronzers, Blushes, and most powders. It applies a flawless application for any powder-based product.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Specktra Socialite
Join Date: Mar 2005
Thanks: 0
Thanked 286 Times in 285 Posts
|
I use my 187 for everything! I powder my face, then put on my MSF and then my Pearlizer!! All with one brush and it's always the best result!
It's worth every cent!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Specktra Senior
Valued Member
Join Date: May 2005
Thanks: 0
Thanked 188 Times in 156 Posts
|
I've always wondered if its ok to use the same one 187 brush to apply powder, then blusher, MSF etc one after the other, thoguht it mgiht be a no-no as product gets on eveyrhting but then again not many people can own multiple 187 and when mine arrives (courtesy of MAC!) i'll be doing the same!
|
|
|
|
|
Specktra Senior
Addicted
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New Zealand
My Mood:
Thanks: 44
Thanked 167 Times in 162 Posts
|
hands down 187 brush for sure!
|
|
|
|
|
Tribe Explorer, Julia
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Switzerland
My Mood:
Thanks: 3,383
Thanked 8,406 Times in 1,719 Posts
|

Which brush should I buy? 187 or 180?
I want to buy my first MAC brush and have heard good things about both these brushes. I use a mineral foundation so I'd want one that can buff, but I also would like to be able to apply blushes with it. I know the 187 skunk brush is more designed for blush, but I've heard people also use it for buffing? I just want to get that flawless finish look on my face and I don't think I can afford both brushes. Which one would you rather recommend? Which one will I get more use out of?
Please state your choice and explain why you recommend this brush over the other.
Last edited by MissChievous : 04-13-2006 at 12:48 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
MAC-a-holic
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Thanks: 2
Thanked 36 Times in 35 Posts
|
I've never used the 180, but I seriously use my 187 for EVERYTHING!!!
Liquids, creams, powders.....it gives everything a perfectly airbrushed finish, and is the real workhorse of all the MAC brushes.
|
|
|
|
|
MAC Freelance Artist
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Thanks: 75
Thanked 27 Times in 24 Posts
|
Get the 187. You will be able to use it for liquids, powders, creams; foundations, blushes, bronzers, MSF. In addition to applying the product, you can also buff and blend easily with it. I don't use mineral foundation, but I don't like the 180 for applying product because it's so flat. I think of it more as a "finishing" brush for buffing foundation and making sure you don't have too much on.
Wait, did you ask this question on LJ too, and I wrote a response about 182 vs. 180?  Anyway, 187 all the way!
|
|
|
|
|
Tribe Explorer, Julia
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Switzerland
My Mood:
Thanks: 3,383
Thanked 8,406 Times in 1,719 Posts
|
No, it wasn't me on LJ as I don't post there.
The thing is, I'm looking for something to replace by powder brush because the one I have, I am very unhappy with. But I'm not sure if I will be able to buff my Bare Escentuals mineral foundation with the #187 because it is very soft. That's why I liked the #180 with the flat head.
Does anyone use the #187 for buffing mineral foundation as well? I sort of think it would ruin the brush because buffing is done with a heavier hand...
|
|
|
|
|
aging hipster
Contributing Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Thanks: 6
Thanked 66 Times in 61 Posts
|
187, silly.
as for WHY.... um, 187 is super-useful, super-versatile, and super-cute. I've never found but so many uses for a kabuki brush.
|
|
|
|
|
Specktra Dean
Specktra Socialite
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
My Mood:
Thanks: 0
Thanked 340 Times in 332 Posts
|
Sorry to follow the herd, but 187 is the logical choice!
|
|
|
|
|
Specktra Junior
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Thanks: 1
Thanked 47 Times in 43 Posts
|
I'm all over the 182 for mineral foundations, actually. The CD Kabuki is great for buffing.
|
|
|
|
|
Tribe Explorer, Julia
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Switzerland
My Mood:
Thanks: 3,383
Thanked 8,406 Times in 1,719 Posts
|
Originally Posted by serendipityii
I'm all over the 182 for mineral foundations, actually. The CD Kabuki is great for buffing.
I just ordered a transfer of the 182 brush from a location that still had it. I'm going to take a look at that one and the 187.
|
|
|
|
|
Zinc Saucier
Contributing Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: CA
Thanks: 24
Thanked 85 Times in 72 Posts
|
I loooooove my 187 brush. I use it for MSF, Bobbi Brown Shimmer Brick, and my NARS bronzer.
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Just Arrived
Join Date: Jul 2005
Thanks: 0
Thanked 570 Times in 599 Posts
|
hmm...see this is tough for me because I love both. Also you are talking about 2 totally different brushes.
The 187 is made to pick up high pigment color and apply it lightly, the 180 is made to buff. While the 187 can buff it does not have the stronge buffing powers of the 180 and the 180 can not pick up color and lay it down the way the 187 does.
So really the question would be do you want a buffer brush or soft layering brush?
sorry not trying to be difficult.
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
 |