AS! #TeamRosyBeige!Another video!! Now I know I want AS for sure!! #TeamRosyBeige http://youtu.be/Dqy2y3TDdbE
Because it's split in the middle. One side is brown, the other is black/white 'skunk' hairs.Can someone explain to me why the 127 looks like a regular black brush in some pics and a white/brown brush in others??
Iirc it's new. Here you go hun. Completely different!is 127 brush new? meaning has it been released before?
It doesn't count lol trust me hahaGreat. Now I want the brush, and the bag!lol
It doesn't count though, right? LOL
you're welcome, @nasquiat! i'm pretty sure RG would be better for us NC40s. an SA applied it on me on Thurs and it looked great! when i asked her which to pick between Delphic and RG, she suggested that i definitely go for RG. Karrie posted a comparison photo of both RG and Golden earlier, and Golden looked way too sheer. i also swatched it alongside RG on Thursday - i couldn't even see Golden on my skin!Thank you for this. I'm NC40/NARS Stromboli as well and I was on the fence about AS, but now it's completely off my list.
So would RG be better than Golden for us?
Wow they are. Yay! Thank you so much!!Iirc it's new. Here you go hun. Completely different!is 127 brush new? meaning has it been released before?
Love your haulyou're welcome, @nasquiat ! i'm pretty sure RG would be better for us NC40s. an SA applied it on me on Thurs and it looked great! when i asked her which to pick between Delphic and RG, she suggested that i definitely go for RG. Karrie posted a comparison photo of both RG and Golden earlier, and Golden looked way too sheer. i also swatched it alongside RG on Thursday - i couldn't even see Golden on my skin! if it helps i've taken some comparison pics of AS on its own, and then again lined up next to RG and SHMH blush so you can see how well it shows up against more pigmented colours in this collection AS swatches with and without pesky annotations (sorry if the font's too small) SMHM, AS, and RG with and without annotations AS could be used for light, natural contouring teamed with a highlighter but without blush. you can see it pales in comparison to SMHM. if you want something brighter and more pigmented, go for either RG or Delphic. the full haul! (minus the extra GotS)
If you want me to swatch it against another blush, just tell me! I've still one or two hours of natural light left.Wow they are. Yay! Thank you so much!!
Thanks so much, this was really helpful. I'm not sure what color I am in Mac foundations but Im a 177 in MUFE foundations which I think is considered to be about an NC 50, maybe less IDK. Based on your swatches, do you think RG would show up on me better or Delphic? I've been leaning RG but another opinion would be nice. Thanks!you're welcome, @nasquiat! i'm pretty sure RG would be better for us NC40s. an SA applied it on me on Thurs and it looked great! when i asked her which to pick between Delphic and RG, she suggested that i definitely go for RG. Karrie posted a comparison photo of both RG and Golden earlier, and Golden looked way too sheer. i also swatched it alongside RG on Thursday - i couldn't even see Golden on my skin!
if it helps i've taken some comparison pics of AS on its own, and then again lined up next to RG and SHMH blush so you can see how well it shows up against more pigmented colours in this collection
AS swatches with and without pesky annotations (sorry if the font's too small)
SMHM, AS, and RG with and without annotations
AS could be used for light, natural contouring teamed with a highlighter but without blush. you can see it pales in comparison to SMHM. if you want something brighter and more pigmented, go for either RG or Delphic.
the full haul! (minus the extra GotS)