Sylvia60
Well-known member
Whew.Sonia wrote me back after I posted it. She said she would not post it and deleted the comment. I will quote part of her email to me.
"Hello Julia,
I got your comment and I wanted to reply to you and tell you why I won't approve it.
Obviously there is always a risk but I understood by talking to them that Japan has the same sources (whatever the company) but I am not supposed to know that, so that is why I am not supposed to say because some things are contractual and then I will be in trouble if I talk on their behalf.
What I understood from any company there, is that they are cruelty free brushes as the animals are not killed for their hair, they are either shaved or they come from exterminations or other natural deaths.
Depending on the countries, they don't know how this hair has been collected (and there are real hair hunters, so they have regulations to discourage them), hence all is flagged endangered species, and all companies depending on how they got the hair sometimes are also enduring those regulations and fall in the same basket."
THis is just a portion of the email. Then I responded with another one. I am trying to be as polite as possible and we are emailing each other back and forth on this.
I have Kolinsky brushes as well as other brushes (see my list).
What can I say, except that I'm going synthetic.
That's easy to say, given my collection.
Even so, once I know the situation, obviously I refuse to support it.