montREALady
Well-known member
The MAC in Macy's Herald Sq will have it.I was already looking forward to repurchasing Dark Diversion
The MAC in Macy's Herald Sq will have it.I was already looking forward to repurchasing Dark Diversion
I want all the things with cute dog names lol. Labradorable is an adorable name (pun intended)Nothing else grabs me, except maybe that Labradorable lipstick.
I guess I will skip as well then. I'm interested in the lipsticks but there are several other neutrals I'd like to have, so I won't chase these if there are no coupons. I'm a little sad because of DD but I also own Nightshade which is similar enough.Ugh, great... 53€ for the brush and no coupons if it's only available on the MAC site. Guess I'm skipping it then. So maybe just VIP n/p for me.
Glad somebody is! LOL!I never paid attention or nothing retained so it must not be interesting to meBUT, the MAC artists at Herald Sq in Macy's are super excited about it.
Yea, I was going to say I wonder if that was it. I've never tried a mineralize lipstick before. What's so bad about them? Too slippery? Not long lasting? Not opaque enough?
Glad somebody is! LOL!
But seriously, that's good to hear.
Too much slip for me plus the price. I'm also not a fan of the packaging...although I do have a random Mineralized Rich lipstick in my collection that needs a partner. I can't stand only having one of something. I have a lonely Sheen Supreme too which I hate but it's driving me nuts that there's only one! Maybe I should just B2M them so I don't have to deal with looking at them anymore lol.Yea, I was going to say I wonder if that was it. I've never tried a mineralize lipstick before. What's so bad about them? Too slippery? Not long lasting? Not opaque enough?
I like the formula itself a lot. Like others, I think the packaging is too bulky and kinda ugly it also bothers me that the tip is cut in a weird angle, but that might be just a quirky thing. In a regular bullet, it could be true love.Yea, I was going to say I wonder if that was it. I've never tried a mineralize lipstick before. What's so bad about them? Too slippery? Not long lasting? Not opaque enough?
Personally, it makes my lips peel. Not in a painful, flesh eating bacteria way, it just seems to make them shed that layer of skin if I wear them all day. The PLW Lipglasses did the same thing to me. Whatever is in MAC's "moisturizing but long wearing" formula just makes my lips react. They're meant to be a medium coverage with some shine. The packaging is chunky and the magnetic closure isn't strong enough to keep the cap securely on if the tube it loose in a purse or something. Out of all the lipsticks MAC carries, Mineralize and Amplified testers are absolutely INFAMOUS for breaking. They're really soft and customers press to hard when swatching and applying, so the lipstick (sometimes slowly) breaks off the base. So, there's that too. There are, however, some really, really beautiful colors. Pure Pout, Glamour Era and Grande Dame were some of my favorites. I'm a neutrals wh0re. retty:Yea, I was going to say I wonder if that was it. I've never tried a mineralize lipstick before. What's so bad about them? Too slippery? Not long lasting? Not opaque enough?
ITA!I like the formula itself a lot. Like others, I think the packaging is too bulky and kinda ugly In a regular bullet, it could be true love.