Twinkle_Twinkle
Well-known member
I would have posted this in the Parrot Re-Release thread, but it was too off-topic, so I thought better of it.
I have been thinking about this recently, and I the more I reflect on it, the more annoyed I get. It is just so frustrating that so many of the MSF are completely unflattering on deeper skin tones.
There are some people with light/medium skintones who can wear all of the MSF's, some with fairer skintones who might stray away from some of the darker colors, but there are a lot of us who simply can't wear some of the shades at all because they are unflattering, and there are many shades that can only be used as a highlighter because they'd be to light anywhere else on the face. The issue has popped up once or twice in other threads, so I decided to write a email to Customer Service and I thought I would share what I wrote:
Hello - I am an avid user of MAC color products, and while I am aware that it takes more than a few requests and inquires to influence new collection colors or re-releases of past collections, I felt that I did want to share my concern that so many of the Mineralize Skinfinishes do not compliment darker skin tones. I am NW45 and really like the texture MSF's but the lightness many of the colors means that I can only use some as highlighters and there are many (such as Gold Spill, Lightscapade, Porcelain Pink, Petticoat, Pleasureflush, Naked You, and New Vegas) that I can not use at all because they are unflattering and leave an ashen cast. It would be nice to see MAC re-release or make MSF’s that compliment deeper skin tones, shades such as So Ceylon, Metal Rock, and Gold Deposit. I understand that no one product is great for everyone, but there are many examples of multi-use products that are more universally flattering (like the Pearlizers, Loose & Pressed Iridescent Powders, the discontinued Sheer Shimmer Powders, and the limited edition Bronzing Sticks) so I don't understand why so many of the Mineralize Skinfinishes have proven to be unflattering on deeper skin tones.
MAC is for "All races, All sexes, All Ages" and I know that many women of color prefer the brand because of the extensive range of foundation shades and for this is reason it is disheartening to see that some of the color products that flatter deeper skin tones, such as Reed and Lovecrush powder blushes are discontinued, or to see many of the MSF's that are being released and re-released flatter fair skin tones more often than their deeper counterparts.
I love MAC, and will continue to purchase products, but I did want to voice this concern. Thank you.
I have been thinking about this recently, and I the more I reflect on it, the more annoyed I get. It is just so frustrating that so many of the MSF are completely unflattering on deeper skin tones.
There are some people with light/medium skintones who can wear all of the MSF's, some with fairer skintones who might stray away from some of the darker colors, but there are a lot of us who simply can't wear some of the shades at all because they are unflattering, and there are many shades that can only be used as a highlighter because they'd be to light anywhere else on the face. The issue has popped up once or twice in other threads, so I decided to write a email to Customer Service and I thought I would share what I wrote:
Hello - I am an avid user of MAC color products, and while I am aware that it takes more than a few requests and inquires to influence new collection colors or re-releases of past collections, I felt that I did want to share my concern that so many of the Mineralize Skinfinishes do not compliment darker skin tones. I am NW45 and really like the texture MSF's but the lightness many of the colors means that I can only use some as highlighters and there are many (such as Gold Spill, Lightscapade, Porcelain Pink, Petticoat, Pleasureflush, Naked You, and New Vegas) that I can not use at all because they are unflattering and leave an ashen cast. It would be nice to see MAC re-release or make MSF’s that compliment deeper skin tones, shades such as So Ceylon, Metal Rock, and Gold Deposit. I understand that no one product is great for everyone, but there are many examples of multi-use products that are more universally flattering (like the Pearlizers, Loose & Pressed Iridescent Powders, the discontinued Sheer Shimmer Powders, and the limited edition Bronzing Sticks) so I don't understand why so many of the Mineralize Skinfinishes have proven to be unflattering on deeper skin tones.
MAC is for "All races, All sexes, All Ages" and I know that many women of color prefer the brand because of the extensive range of foundation shades and for this is reason it is disheartening to see that some of the color products that flatter deeper skin tones, such as Reed and Lovecrush powder blushes are discontinued, or to see many of the MSF's that are being released and re-released flatter fair skin tones more often than their deeper counterparts.
I love MAC, and will continue to purchase products, but I did want to voice this concern. Thank you.