MAC In Extra Dimension Collection 2013 (April 2013)
- Thread starter Mac-Guy
- Start date
gracie90
Well-known member
Quote:
I hope you find something that works great, I'm very happy to have found my perfect brow colour
I ended up with the redhead e/s duo, but I only really use Expresso. My brows are dark brown, whilst my hair is slightly lighter and has a reddish tint to it. The Brunette duo was wayyy too grey-ish/dark for me!
I hope you find something that works great, I'm very happy to have found my perfect brow colour
CiaoBellaa
Well-known member
Found this in Makeup Artist magazine!
KrystalAnne
Well-known member
is that a blush in the middle? It kind of reminds me of launch away.Found this in Makeup Artist magazine!
erine1881
Well-known member
I believe it's a CCB, as it's the same size as the ED shadow.
CiaoBellaa
Well-known member
Hey guys, sorry for any confusion. I know the photo is kind of hard to see but in person it's easier to see that the product in the middle is an extra dimension blush. It's bigger than the shadow and has the extra dimension pattern in it. It's just really hard to see because it's quite a light color and the photo might be warped because the magazine doesn't lie completely flat. But on a side note- don't these look beautiful? I'm loving that color of the blush and the eyeshadow appears to be the iridescent lavender in the color story! I'm very very excited 
Naughtyp
Well-known member
what is a CCB?
BeautyByLele
Well-known member
Cream Color Base
erine1881
Well-known member
Wow! It totally shows no design at all! Silly picture!Hey guys, sorry for any confusion. I know the photo is kind of hard to see but in person it's easier to see that the product in the middle is an extra dimension blush. It's bigger than the shadow and has the extra dimension pattern in it. It's just really hard to see because it's quite a light color and the photo might be warped because the magazine doesn't lie completely flat. But on a side note- don't these look beautiful? I'm loving that color of the blush and the eyeshadow appears to be the iridescent lavender in the color story! I'm very very excited
bluelitzer
Well-known member
Made a new years resolution to skip all blushes this year as much as possible unless if they have special packaging AND are in a color family that I do not have, then maybe. I want to at least hit pan on one this year. There's just alot to go through. Powder blush doesn't look good on my skin right now (which is on the drier side the whole winter long) so I've been converting the ones I have to cream blush per use. My favorite so far is MAC Peaches as a cream blush dusted very lightly with one sweep of Shell Pearl beauty powder. Looks really pretty
Spikesmom
Well-known member
Hmmm... It looks to me like it might be the mid-tone mauve shadow.Hey guys, sorry for any confusion. I know the photo is kind of hard to see but in person it's easier to see that the product in the middle is an extra dimension blush. It's bigger than the shadow and has the extra dimension pattern in it. It's just really hard to see because it's quite a light color and the photo might be warped because the magazine doesn't lie completely flat. But on a side note- don't these look beautiful? I'm loving that color of the blush and the eyeshadow appears to be the iridescent lavender in the color story! I'm very very excited
CiaoBellaa
Well-known member
Maybe you're right! Whatever it is, I want it
Naughtyp
Well-known member
Thanks
martiangurll
Well-known member
thank goodness for soemthing! this MAC lull is driving me bonkers. The mauve looking e/s is exactly what I have been wanting in this formula--yay MAC
Found this in Makeup Artist magazine!
Audrey C
Well-known member
The mauve does look nice. It looks like a dirty mauve from the pic; I might need to add it to my list with Zestful. I may try my first EDSF this time; the warmer pink and brick combo looks like something I could wear. I'm definitely all over the 235; I've been able to track down the other brushes from the collection it originally launched with, but I'm missing this one.
