On a more serious? note- We darted into Mac PRO store this afternoon to pick up two Show Orchids for my mom-( who still loves to rock killer lips while at the opera-lol - she's one of the great dames who still loves the Lauren Bacall aesthetic!) and one of my daughter's visiting friends was talking to two of the SAs who was saying rather hush hushly- that MAC had had it with illegal transactors who mess it up for everyone else. Moreover, that they were indeed looking into pursuing legal recourse to not only rectify the matter but to set an example/precedent so that this never happens again..... Idle gossip/tongues wagging - or is this something that others can confirm. I just looked busy and distracted because I didn't really wish to engage- but it did leave me wondering.
Richelle- you appear to have your finger on the pulse of what is trending- what have you heard? Thanks-
I just don't see this happening.
I really truly doubt MUAs are in the know regarding legal action. I would assume if MAC chose to go that route that the people involved would be sophisticated enough to not let information trickle down like that. They allowed some pre-launch transactions to go through, so if they wanted to show that this was unacceptable they should have cancelled them all. By allowing some they would have a harder time proving their side, if they were bringing legal action against people. Possibly they would have to take people to court in the state they live in, which would be extremely difficult (don't know for sure since I am not an attorney).
I think the more likely scenario is possibly banning people who they feel break their rules. I wouldn't like it if it happened to me, but I would easily get over it. It would be interesting to see how it played out if they chose that route. If they didn't do anything to bloggers who shared the link but banned customers, well that might be the beginning of the end.
This is all my arm chair speculation of course.