I'm fairly new to armani, what's the difference between the REs and the Rouge D'Armani lipsticks? Thanks!
Can't wait to see everyones swatches! They do look like colors I'd gravitate towards.
I don't have a massive collection, but in my personal experience I find the Rouge d'Armani (and Rouge d'Armani sheers) are a bit more balm-like, a bit more sheer, and a bit slipperier than the RE, which is by comparison a bit thicker and more opaque and has a bit less slip. But the biggest thing for me is - like
@dvdiest mentioned - the RE have a fragrance that isn't my favorite. I can put up with it and it does fade, but I don't personally like it. On the plus side, I don't detect a bad taste despite the fragrance. Rouge d'Armani and Rouge d'Armani Sheers are fragrance-free and are among my favorite lippies ever. I reach for them all the time because they're just so fool-proof. No matter how dry or flakey my lips are, they just seem to glide on and wear well. But they're not as creamy or slippery as, say, the new Chanel Rouge Cocos, so in my experience the wear time is better. The wear time on the RE is the best among them though. The couple I have are VERY opaque and I find I typically dab the color on and distribute it with my finger because otherwise it would be "too much" for me (granted they are darker colors though - and I tend to go easy with darker shades to begin with). But I'm not an opaque, bold lip gal. If you are, you might prefer the RE (but that is not to say that the Rouge d'Armani are not pigmented, because they are). In contrast, I swipe straight from the bullet and layer numerous times with both the Rouge d'Armani and Rouge d'Armani sheers. They're all good. I just wish the RE didn't have a fragrance.