Got this in response to an FB post I made a few days agohboy:
![]()
I emailed them twice in one month regarding them charging shipping to pro purchases online and they never replied. After a month they finally fixed the problem but still never responded to meI knew it!! They need to give us back at least $2 for the mislabeling :haha: I asked them the same question on launch day but they never responded...or I didn't notice. Thanks for the info and now I know I'm not crazy :loco:
:lmao:Well considering they can't even spell the finish of their own lipsticks, I'm not sure I am "assured"!
They crack me up. I really don't know what's going on over there...to be a fly on the wall
"MAC Heaux Lipstick ($17.00 for 0.10 oz.) is described as a “berry.” It’s a medium-dark, berry-red with a hint of pink and subtle, cool undertones (it almost looks warm-toned against my complexion at times). This shade was released previously with a Retro Matte finish, but it is now an Amplified finish. The color is similar, though a little more muted and less cool-toned to me, while the formula applies better and is more forgiving once it warms up, but it doesn’t last as long (it wears for five hours in this formula). It had semi-opaque color payoff that went on evenly, and the formula was neither drying nor hydrating. Burberry Bright Plum (15) (P, $30.00) is darker. Buxom Menace (P, $21.00) is glossier. NARS Palais Royal (P, $25.00) is darker, warmer. Bite Beauty Aubergine (P, $24.00) is cooler. NARS Vera (P, $32.00) is lighter, brighter, cooler. Tom Ford Beauty Moroccan Rouge (DC, $50.00) is more shimmery, darker, cooler. Tom Ford Beauty Didier (LE, $32.00) is more shimmery, darker, cooler. Estee Lauder Thrilling (P, $30.00) is lighter, brighter. Estee Lauder Unattainable (P, $30.00) is cooler, less glossy. Estee Lauder Intriguing (P, $30.00) is more muted. See comparison swatches / compare dupes side-by-side."http://www.temptalia.com/mac-flowerscope-heaux-quelle-surprise-lipsticks-reviews-photos-swatches#more-203424
I'm so confused that I dont even know what's up or down with this Heaux. The press info clearly states it's a cremesheen, Mac says its cremesheen, Temptalia says its amplified and all the boxes + retail lipsticks are labelled Amplified. Jeez."MAC Heaux Lipstick ($17.00 for 0.10 oz.) is described as a “berry.” It’s a medium-dark, berry-red with a hint of pink and subtle, cool undertones (it almost looks warm-toned against my complexion at times). This shade was released previously with a Retro Matte finish, but it is now an Amplified finish. The color is similar, though a little more muted and less cool-toned to me, while the formula applies better and is more forgiving once it warms up, but it doesn’t last as long (it wears for five hours in this formula). It had semi-opaque color payoff that went on evenly, and the formula was neither drying nor hydrating. Burberry Bright Plum (15) (P, $30.00) is darker. Buxom Menace (P, $21.00) is glossier. NARS Palais Royal (P, $25.00) is darker, warmer. Bite Beauty Aubergine (P, $24.00) is cooler. NARS Vera (P, $32.00) is lighter, brighter, cooler. Tom Ford Beauty Moroccan Rouge (DC, $50.00) is more shimmery, darker, cooler. Tom Ford Beauty Didier (LE, $32.00) is more shimmery, darker, cooler. Estee Lauder Thrilling (P, $30.00) is lighter, brighter. Estee Lauder Unattainable (P, $30.00) is cooler, less glossy. Estee Lauder Intriguing (P, $30.00) is more muted. See comparison swatches / compare dupes side-by-side."
Wonder if she's just going by the box or if she really knows?
I'm going with what MAC says. No one is going to own up that the labels were an error though.I'm so confused that I dont even know what's up or down with this Heaux. The press info clearly states it's a cremesheen, Mac says its cremesheen, Temptalia says its amplified and all the boxes + retail lipsticks are labelled Amplified. Jeez.
Now I'm just confused..."[COLOR=333333][COLOR=DD3789]MAC Heaux Lipstick[/COLOR][/COLOR][COLOR=333333] ($17.00 for 0.10 oz.) is described as a “berry.” It’s a medium-dark, berry-red with a hint of pink and subtle, cool undertones (it almost looks warm-toned against my complexion at times). This shade was released previously with a Retro Matte finish, but it is now an Amplified finish. The color is similar, though a little more muted and less cool-toned to me, while the formula applies better and is more forgiving once it warms up, but it doesn’t last as long (it wears for five hours in this formula). It had semi-opaque color payoff that went on evenly, and the formula was neither drying nor hydrating. [/COLOR][COLOR=DD3789]Burberry Bright Plum (15)[/COLOR][COLOR=333333] (P, $30.00) is darker. [/COLOR][COLOR=DD3789]Buxom Menace[/COLOR][COLOR=333333] (P, $21.00) is glossier. [/COLOR][COLOR=DD3789]NARS Palais Royal[/COLOR][COLOR=333333] (P, $25.00) is darker, warmer. [/COLOR][COLOR=DD3789]Bite Beauty Aubergine[/COLOR][COLOR=333333] (P, $24.00) is cooler. [/COLOR][COLOR=DD3789]NARS Vera[/COLOR][COLOR=333333] (P, $32.00) is lighter, brighter, cooler. [/COLOR][COLOR=DD3789]Tom Ford Beauty Moroccan Rouge[/COLOR][COLOR=333333] (DC, $50.00) is more shimmery, darker, cooler. [/COLOR][COLOR=DD3789]Tom Ford Beauty Didier[/COLOR][COLOR=333333] (LE, $32.00) is more shimmery, darker, cooler. [/COLOR][COLOR=DD3789]Estee Lauder Thrilling[/COLOR][COLOR=333333] (P, $30.00) is lighter, brighter. [/COLOR][COLOR=DD3789]Estee Lauder Unattainable[/COLOR][COLOR=333333] (P, $30.00) is cooler, less glossy. [/COLOR][COLOR=DD3789]Estee Lauder Intriguing[/COLOR][COLOR=333333] (P, $30.00) is more muted. [/COLOR][COLOR=DD3789]See comparison swatches[/COLOR][COLOR=333333] / [/COLOR][COLOR=DD3789]compare dupes side-by-side[/COLOR][COLOR=333333]."[/COLOR] [COLOR=333333]Wonder if she's just going by the box or if she really knows?[/COLOR]
You're my kinda dork too @jravae! I recently started a spreadsheet, I need to add my non-MAC/NYX/WnW lippies. I wonder if I have any E's, lol.![]()
Quote: Originally Posted by Marsha Pomells![]()
Dorks unite... I need to go through mine and see if I got any J, X, Y and Z
Even though everyone looks so pretty in their pics I think I definitely could have skipped this collection. I think I've finally figured out that I'm a matte/satin kinda girl.http://www.temptalia.com/mac-flowerscope-heaux-quelle-surprise-lipsticks-reviews-photos-swatches#more-203424
Pretty ladies!
Satin would of been divine!Everybody looks beautiful in new heaux I wish it would have been a satin finish I would have got like 4 of them
Yes they should! :haha: You were totally spot on with your finish assessment.I knew it!! They need to give us back at least $2 for the mislabeling :haha: I asked them the same question on launch day but they never responded...or I didn't notice. Thanks for the info and now I know I'm not crazy :loco:
Right? :haha:Well considering they can't even spell the finish of their own lipsticks, I'm not sure I am "assured"!
I think I only have one as well. Pervette, I think it is.a glaze finish would have been love I think I only have one Mac glaze finish lipstick Mac need to make more
Heaux with FB ll Like the first time, i dont like it. For red/berries or dark colors I prefer mattes/retromattes o Satin.![]()
Beautiful ladies!
Now I'm just confused...
Pervette....... now that is a blast from the past. I have not worn that lipstick in a long, long time. I need to pull it out. Thanks for the reminder.I think I only have one as well. Pervette, I think it is.