JustAddSparkles
Well-known member
And she still looks great!
Britney releases unedited pictures of herself
- Thread starter banana1234
- Start date
Meisje
Well-known member
I think she looks fantastic in the unretouched ones.
I have a huge issue with how they shrink bodies while retouching. In my mind, retouching should be to remove a pimple, bruise, scar or shadow on the skin, lighten the depth of armpit shadows when they look too contrasted, intensify or correct color, change backgrounds, remove stray hairs or wrinkles on clothes... I can understand wanting to retouch cellulite or stretch marks.
I think it's great to make a photo look more artistic or aesthetically pleasing with retouching, but to shrink and warp a person's body so that it's no longer anything near a realistic representation of the person is wrong. I wish it was regulated somehow.
I have a huge issue with how they shrink bodies while retouching. In my mind, retouching should be to remove a pimple, bruise, scar or shadow on the skin, lighten the depth of armpit shadows when they look too contrasted, intensify or correct color, change backgrounds, remove stray hairs or wrinkles on clothes... I can understand wanting to retouch cellulite or stretch marks.
I think it's great to make a photo look more artistic or aesthetically pleasing with retouching, but to shrink and warp a person's body so that it's no longer anything near a realistic representation of the person is wrong. I wish it was regulated somehow.
baton
Well-known member
even jessica's so called no makeup it's pretty evident that she's got some eyeliner on her lower lash. so if she's really going for no makeup, then maybe it really should not be obvious that she's not completely makeup free. although i guess 95% makeup free is better than nothing she must have figured.
