I kind of think a minority government is a good thing. I like the idea that whoever we elect can't do whatever they want until we elect someone else.
In fact, some countries have electoral systems designed to put more minority governments in power, ie representation by percentage of vote, rather than by ridings as we have it. For example Sweden. For example, the Green Party got a percentage of the vote for the last election that was equivalent to more than one seat in Parliament, but didn't get a seat. This is because all of those who voted for the Green Party were spread out throughout so many ridings that there wasn't a majority in any riding. So basically our system allows the bigger parties to have a higher percentage of seats than they do the vote, and screws the smaller parties. And the reasoning behind the riding system is so that everyone has a member of parliament who will represent their interests. Sounds great, except when you consider that it's very rare for a MP to do anything but vote with their party. Just something to think about.
ETA: Ok, to clarify the rep by percentage thing. In the 2006 election;
Conservatives: 36% of the vote, 40% of the seats
Liberals: 30% of vote, 34% of the seats
Bloc Quebecois: 10.5% vote vs 17% seats
NDP: 17.5% vote vs 9.4% seats
Green: 4.5% vote vs 0% seats
Other: 1% vote vs 0.3% seats
So as you can see, the smaller parties generally get screwed while the bigger ones benefit.
@ snowflakelashes - I feel you, Canadian politics can be pretty boring, and its hard to feel anything other than dismal about the prospect of anything changing. But kudos to you for voting anyway.