So the problem was that I used Inglot as an example? Well i thought it was appropriate, as it was an Inglot thread. How about I edit to "NARS will only accept applicants with formal training" or "you need to have gone to school in order to work at MUFE." Stating the sky is blue is not a shit disturbing comment, nor is you don't need to be experienced (oh my! a fact!) just pretty (Wow, I've had trained MUA friends get turned from MAC because they weren't pretty enough. OMG how dare me NOT instead say "well you won't get hired if you're not pretty at MAC, but oh yeah, you can be a real Ugo AND work there!" The nerve of me and my horrible actual fact habit! They really should have meetings for this sort of non-compulsive lying!)
If the Inglot near you was in Canada, and hired someone who did not attend makeup school, then the manager did so against company policy. The furthest they can push it is to hire on someone CURRENTLY attending makeup school, and even then they are not allowed to do appointments.
It's the same with getting a pro discount. At Inglot you MUST include a photocopy of your diploma along with one other piece of industry ID (paystub, business card, call sheet, tear page, whatever). At MAC, you need two pieces of industry ID, but you DON'T need a diploma as one of them. (ie: call sheet and business card would be enough.. oh but wait, they don't care if you're qualified, because you're paying them for your discount!)
But I'm sure someone here will be equally as outraged that I ACTUALLY typed out pro discount requirements for two different stores.