Thanks for posting all the pictures!!Hooray RiRi
I thought that I would like the nude but I need to see swatches ... it looks like it could be 'muddy.'I don't like the color of that nude lipstick..
Someone else said it looked like their fav cappuccino Lippie and I had the same one I think, it finally got tossed out but if was my fav nude lg to wear with plum liner. This nude wasnt on my list , but full face swatches will help me decide for sure. As of right now though, it's a skip!I thought that I would like the nude but I need to see swatches ... it looks like it could be 'muddy.'Defn have to use the right color lip liner to pull it off. But the packaging ..... trying so hard to be open minded but UGH! They could have done so much better.
Thanks for the pics!!! def picking up the quad.
I heard that too! Basically everything you put on Internet is public property even the personal pictures. Instagram and Facebook have stated in their terms and conditions, that all the pictures you upload there belong to them and they can sell it andso as they please. There was an example mentioned in an article about an artist who worked really hard on his piece of art, had instagram sell his work. It was printed on something and the third party and instagram made money out of it. The artist had nothing to stand on! Because his work wasnt copyrighted Its moral code to credit people , but legally there is nothing you can really doThanks again itsbcuzirock! I'm not too excited with the products shown so far. About the picture stealing and not giving credit thing. I talked about this with someone else. He told me that people are allowed to take pictures if the person they are originally from doesn't have copyright on them. To get copyright you have to pay a lot of money and you need to have a company or something (the last thing I'm not completely sure about anymore). So although I completely understand the frustration, it seems like they are not really stealing pictures if you don't have copyright on them from what I understand
you can watermark it, so it would be less easy to pretend the picture is hers!Thanks for your input. That's a horrible story about the artistI heard that too! Basically everything you put on Internet is public property even the personal pictures. Instagram and Facebook have stated in their terms and conditions, that all the pictures you upload there belong to them and they can sell it andso as they please. There was an example mentioned in an article about an artist who worked really hard on his piece of art, had instagram sell his work. It was printed on something and the third party and instagram made money out of it. The artist had nothing to stand on! Because his work wasnt copyrighted Its moral code to credit people , but legally there is nothing you can really do
I'm rethinking the nude a little bit. Thank you, itsbcuzirock!
I'm not saying someone else can't screenshot a pic and use it on their wall, everyone does that. What I'm talking about is claiming a picture is yours, or not correcting others when they assume a pic is yours. If there's a watermark already on there, it's evident the pic isn't yours, and it gives credit to the appropriate person without anything being said or done. Is it law to credit someone? No. But Innatchka's right. It the right thing to do.Thanks again itsbcuzirock! I'm not too excited with the products shown so far. About the picture stealing and not giving credit thing. I talked about this with someone else. He told me that people are allowed to take pictures if the person they are originally from doesn't have copyright on them. To get copyright you have to pay a lot of money and you need to have a company or something (the last thing I'm not completely sure about anymore). So although I completely understand the frustration, it seems like they are not really stealing pictures if you don't have copyright on them from what I understand
I really do agree with you on this as a newbie myself I learn a lot here
.... Well, I'm now CERTAIN that I don't want anything accept TTT l/s... kinda disappointing, but my wallet is crying tears of joy. More money to spend on Mac's retro matte collection
Right?! The packaging for one is so all over the place and in your face! And that NUDE? That's NUDE?! No. Just no to all of this. And especially with the fiasco of the RiRi Hearts Summer Collection, the less I get, the less stress.
Not true, in most countries anyway, certainly not the ones we're in! Copyright is automatic, it is in place as soon as the original work (eg photograph) is created. What is potentially expensive is enforcing it. The whole thing with FB, IG etc does make it more complicated though, and I don't know exactly how that all works.Thanks again itsbcuzirock! I'm not too excited with the products shown so far.
About the picture stealing and not giving credit thing. I talked about this with someone else. He told me that people are allowed to take pictures if the person they are originally from doesn't have copyright on them. To get copyright you have to pay a lot of money and you need to have a company or something (the last thing I'm not completely sure about anymore). So although I completely understand the frustration, it seems like they are not really stealing pictures if you don't have copyright on them from what I understand
yes, if you do a photograph, that one is yours, nobody should steal it and if he does you have the right to ask him to remove it from his website or page etc.. If somebody use your picture for commercial stuff (magazine, advertisement and so on), he seriously risk to be reported by you ( and must give you a lot of money).
