caffn8me
Well-known member
Quote:
Anyone with more than an ounce and a half of functioning brain will soon realise that if they launch their car at another car in the opposite direction with the intention of killing themself, there is just as good a chance of killing the occupants of the other car, all things being equal. The other car doesn't have any magic invulnerability. She was well educated, her actions were deliberate. The correct charge is murder.
As Ladybug10678 says, she'd have been better off driving into a tree. Firstly, she'd have been much less likely to injure anyone else (not many folks live in trees these days) and secondly, she'd have been more likely to kill herself. Trees are very unforgiving and don't have crumple zones. In a high speed collision between a car and a tree, the tree always wins.
Anyone with more than an ounce and a half of functioning brain will soon realise that if they launch their car at another car in the opposite direction with the intention of killing themself, there is just as good a chance of killing the occupants of the other car, all things being equal. The other car doesn't have any magic invulnerability. She was well educated, her actions were deliberate. The correct charge is murder.
As Ladybug10678 says, she'd have been better off driving into a tree. Firstly, she'd have been much less likely to injure anyone else (not many folks live in trees these days) and secondly, she'd have been more likely to kill herself. Trees are very unforgiving and don't have crumple zones. In a high speed collision between a car and a tree, the tree always wins.