Toy-R-Us $25,000 prize for first American baby born in 2007

Raerae

Well-known member
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070106/...t_baby_dispute

Toys 'R' Us baby contest sparks fuss

NEW YORK - Toys "R" Us Inc. has come under fire for denying a Chinese-American infant a $25,000 savings bond prize in a contest for the New Year's first baby because the company said the girl's mother is not a legal U.S. resident.

The company's decision — which came less than a month after it opened its first mainland China store, in Shanghai — has infuriated some Chinese-American advocates.

Yuki Lin was born at the stroke of midnight at New York Downtown Hospital, according to hospital officials. She won a random drawing held to break a tie with two other babies entered in the contest, Toys "R" Us spokeswoman Kathleen Waugh said.

The Wayne, N.J.-based company had said the prize would go to the first American baby born in 2007.

Although promotional materials called for "all expectant New Year's mothers" to apply for the contest, Waugh said eligibility rules required babies' mothers to be legal residents. Many sweepstakes have such requirements, Waugh said.

Although Yuki was born an American citizen, Waugh said the contest administrator was told that Yuki's mother "was not a legal resident of the United States."

Attempts to reach Yuki's parents, Yan Zhu Liu and Han Lin, 22, for comment were unsuccessful early Saturday. Their immigration status was not clear.

The prize went instead to runner-up Jayden Swain, born 19 seconds after midnight at Northeast Georgia Medical Center in Gainesville, Ga. The third baby in the running was born in Bay Shore, N.Y., to a couple from El Salvador.

Some Chinese-American advocates say the company's decision smacks of second-class citizenship.

"People are just pretty much outraged," said John Wang, president of the New York-based Asian American Business Development Center.

Albert Wang, an attorney, has launched an e-mail campaign on the issue. "She was deprived of $25,000 intended to be used for her college education because of who her parents are," he said.

Janet Keller, a grandmother of the winning baby, said revisiting the contest would be unfair.

"She was disqualified — that should be it," Keller said. "Don't go changing your mind now."

___

On the Net:

Toys "R" Us: http://www.toysrus.com/


Sooooooo.....

Think the Chinese Immigrant baby should win, or is Toys-R-Us correct in saying, the parents were not US Citizens, thus they didn't qualify based on the rules of the competition.

Are Chinese-American's allowed to be upset over this? Afterall, rules are rules.
 

Shimmer

Well-known member
erm.
technically, since she was born in the states, regardless of her parents' status, she's a citizen.

That said, I agree with the decision.
 

Bernadette

Well-known member
Right on Toys R Us! Finally someone doing the right thing, that's how I look at it.
clap.gif
 

Dreamergirl3

Well-known member
Well...if it was in the rules for sure that both parents had to be a US citizen, then I think it's fair to disqualify her.
 

*Stargazer*

Well-known member
I bet in the rules it doesn't specify citizen, simply LEGAL resident. And apparently, Mom isn't here legally. (Although, now that I think about it, I suppose Mom could still be here legally and not be a legal resident.) If you read the fine print of most contests, you have to be legal to win.

Now, the interesting question would be who is the winner, as it is laid out in the contest? Was the contest for the first baby or the first woman to give birth? And then what did it specify regarding legal status? I am willing to be the legal dept of TRU is smart enough to obey the rules of the contest they set up.

If this " Waugh said eligibility rules required babies' mothers to be legal residents" is in fact correct, then TRU is one hundred percent right.
 

Fairybelle

Well-known member
This is terrible that it happened and it is terrible that such a fun-intended contest had to end like this, but at least TRU stood their ground and, well, sometimes you have to stand by the rules even if it hurts, and if the rules said the mom had to be a legal US citizen...that's the rules.

I hope TRU gives out consolation prizes to the other babies...that is, if they are smart they will!
smiles.gif
 

Shawna

Well-known member
Most contests I enter or have thought of entering all start off by saying in the fine print "open to all legal residents of Canada" blah blah blah. If she wasn't a legal resident, then she couldn't have won the contest. It sucks for her, but the rules are rules. If she isn't legal and was still awarded the prize, I think people would boycott TRU.
 

prinzessin784

Well-known member
It is unfortunate that this happened to someone other than a white person because that's what makes it an issue. People automatically thought that it was a racial thing when really it's just because the mother didn't qualify under the clearly stated rules. Sorry people, but just because someone happens to be turned down for something and happens to be of a minority racial or ethnic group doesn't make it racism.

A second point, the mother of the baby that ended up winning sounds like a royal bitch. She's basically like "too bad, so sad, you lost, I WIN!! hahahaha!" She could have said something a little more sensitive...I'm sure it would suck to be told you won $25,000 for your kid and then have it taken away for something like that. And I see how it would be hard to feel like it wasn't based on race, but seriously people, I don't think Toys R Us cares if you're white, Asian, French, or a penquin in Antarctica - they just want to promote their company and make money!
 

jenii

Well-known member
I don't know what to think, tbh. I'd have to see the rules. If the rules state that the *mother* has to be a legal resident of the US, then she wasn't eligible in the first place. Really, though, I think it's their fault for not checking up on the winner before handing over the money. They should run a check first, *then* announce the winner when they're sure the applicant followed all the rules.

Still, if she didn't follow the rules, it's only right she was disqualified. Sucks, though. I'd love to get $25,000!
winks.gif
 

*Stargazer*

Well-known member
LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME


Quote:
NEW YORK (Jan. 6) - After coming under fire for denying a Chinese-American infant a $25,000 prize in a New Year's baby contest because her mother was not a legal U.S. resident, the Toys "R" Us company said Saturday evening that it had reversed its decision.

The company said it would award each of the three babies in the grand prize pool of the "First Baby of the Year Sweepstakes" a $25,000 savings bond. Toys "R" us is the parent company of Babies "R" Us, which sponsored the contest.

Toys "R" Us, which opened its first mainland China store less than a month ago, changed its mind after Chinese-American advocates protested and the story was reported in ethnic newspapers and The New York Times among other outlets.

"We love all babies," the company said in a written statement Saturday. "Our sweepstakes was intended to welcome the first baby of 2007 and prepare for its future. We deeply regret that this sweepstakes became a point of controversy."

The prize was originally supposed to go to Yuki Lin, who was born at the stroke of midnight at New York Downtown Hospital, according to hospital officials.

She won a random drawing with two other babies for the $25,000 savings bond, said Toys "R" Us spokeswoman Kathleen Waugh. The Wayne, N.J. company had said it would go to the first American baby born in 2007.

Yuki was born an American citizen. But the company disqualified her because "the sweepstakes administrator was informed that the mother of the baby born at New York Downtown Hospital was not a legal resident of the United States," Waugh said.

Although promotional materials called for "all expectant New Year's mothers" to apply, Waugh said eligibility rules required babies' mothers to be legal residents. Many sweepstakes have such requirements, Waugh said.

Attempts to reach Yuki's parents, Yan Zhu Liu and Han Lin, 22, were unsuccessful Saturday. Their immigration status was not clear.

The original prize was instead awarded to runner-up Jayden Swain, born 19 seconds after midnight at Northeast Georgia Medical Center in Gainesville, Ga. The third baby in the running was born in Bay Shore, N.Y., to a couple from El Salvador.

Chinese-American advocates had complained that the toy company's decision smacks of second-class citizenship. They said the prize should was supposed to be for the child, not the mother. One attorney launched an e-mail campaign on the issue.

"People are just pretty much outraged," John Wang, president of the New York-based Asian American Business Development Center, told the Times for Saturday's editions.

On the other side, Janet K. Keller, a grandmother of the winning baby, said revisiting the contest would be unfair. "She was disqualified - that should be it," she told the Times. "Don't go changing your mind now."

Way to demonstrate that the American way is to cheat and then sue (I'm sure that would have been the next move) when you lose.
 

Fairybelle

Well-known member
Quote:
Originally Posted by prinzessin784
apparently she gets her way anyway...
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/01/06/fir....ap/index.html

They are giving the prize to the top three contestants. That's b.s.


Just read this. Yeah, the secondary prizes should have been smaller, like gift certificates to TRU or something. I agree, that is wrong. Rules are rules, you can't change them just because someone wants them bent to fit. Oh well. I guess TRU won't be doing this again...
 

Shimmer

Well-known member
This reminds me of the Southlake Carroll incident last year:

GIRLS GONE WILD
At Carroll Senior High School in Southlake, the school board had to get involved in a nasty cheerleader dispute that made headlines and dragged on for three months. Tryouts initially produced a 14-girl squad. But an administrator allowed four more senior girls onto the squad, which sparked a protest from parents of the 15 other girls who had not been chosen. So administrators said all 33 girls could be cheerleaders. At which point, the parents of the original 14 filed a formal grievance, claiming that their daughters had gotten the shaft. And that led the school board to reverse the decision, cutting the squad back to 14, and it mandated a new round of tryouts for everybody else. Of course, parents of the other 19 then filed a
grievance of their own, whereupon the school board un-reversed its reversal and reinstated the entire gaggle of 33 girls.
Source
 

*Stargazer*

Well-known member
Ahhhh, the insanity that is Texas high school sports. Add the litigious nature of Americans and you have a drama worthy of the Lifetime Movie Network.
 
Top