Quote: Originally Posted by
lilinah
For a moisturizer i recommend looking at http://beautypedia.com.
Product ratings are reviewed based on ingredients. They include everything from really cheap to really high end -- price is not a determining factor on whether it works. That way you can find a brand and a product that suits your needs and price range.
Moisturizers With SPF:
http://www.paulaschoice.com/beautypedia-skin-care-reviews/best-skin-care-products/Skin-Care/Moisturizers-With-Sunscreen
Moisturizers Without SPF:
http://www.paulaschoice.com/beautypedia-skin-care-reviews/best-skin-care-products/Skin-Care/Moisturizers-Without-Sunscreen
Just be aware that this site is a little biased and tends to rate PC products as the best of the best. If you are unsure about some of the ingredients, you can do a double-check with cosdna.com or ewc.org too.
And the site recommends many other products as best of the best as well. PC products (theirs) are not the only ones that get rated highly.
48 BEST Moisturizers without SPF, and 41 are not Paula's (over 85% not hers), and they range in price from $11.79 to $110.
50 BEST Moisturizers with SPF, and 44 are not Paula's (88% are not hers), and they range in price from $12.95 to $75.
And you can just search Moisturizers without SPF and Moisturizers with SPF to check out any you've been using or that other people recommend to see what beautypedia has to say and make your own decision.
For a long time there were no Paula's Choice products and everyone's products were rated as objectively as possible. So just 'cuz her products are there is no reason to skip the site. It sure isn't as if hers are the only products rated highly. I think they began making products for two reasons. Yeah, to make some money, sure, otherwise why be in business? But also to make relatively inexpensive quality skin care products available. With many expensive products we end up just paying for brand name, pretty packaging, and all too often fragrance which is irritating to facial skin, and all too many don't have enough ingredients that are really helpful.
I don't bother with their cosmetics reviews, though, except for foundations/tinted moisturizers/concealers/etc. and mascaras, because they seem to only like matte neutrals - and i like highly colorful and sometimes sparkly (as well as neutrals).
ecw.org is the Energy Center of Wisconsin. I think you meant http://ewg.org (Environmental Working Group), which has a very different outlook from beautypedia. They do not rate for the effectiveness of a product, but rather based on ingredient safety. They may rate a product highly that is not efficacious because is it safe. I use ewg to check out sunscreens and to familiarize myself with the safety of ingredients.
I don't know much about http://cosdna.com - i never heard of them until today. There's no "About Us" to know who they are, what their mission is, or who sponsors them. Some of their pages will say whether cosmetic ingredients are skin irritating, acne or comedogenic, and safe (there are ingredients in skin care and make up that are potential endocrine disruptors, for example). Some of their pages just say what the purpose of an ingredient is.