Medgal07
Well-known member
I noticed that Rouge Noir Le Vernis has the same designated number as Vamp------they're both # 18. When I compare them side/side Vamp has a bit of shimmer.Thanks!Unfortunately no.
I noticed that Rouge Noir Le Vernis has the same designated number as Vamp------they're both # 18. When I compare them side/side Vamp has a bit of shimmer.Thanks!Unfortunately no.
Have you experienced dryness with other Chanel RAs? I certainly understand your hesitation to purchase it.. Hopefully someone here who purchased Pensive canThanks Medgal, I also use lip balms on its own and under lipstick but my lips are still dry. One of the few lip products that I find actually improves the condition of my lips is the Dior Addict fluid stick. I'll have to try the Rouge Coco Baume. Thanks for the recommendation.
Oh, well then I must purchase it right!I noticed that Rouge Noir Le Vernis has the same designated number as Vamp------they're both # 18. When I compare them side/side Vamp has a bit of shimmer.
I totally agree with you! She always states that she is rating products according to what the brand claims for the product but i think this is an old fashioned way of rating. Of course there are eye shadows that perform better even without a primer , (For Entrelacs i read a lot of rants from other bloggers too so i think that she is quite to the point for this product) and let's talk honestly now.if this palette(Entrelacs ) was not released from Chanel everyone would react like :"another neutral palette, i don't care! I have thousands of neutral palettes" All in all, My thought is Who is gonna pay 80 dollars for a Chanel palette that only 2 of the 5 eyeshadows are good and the rest mediocre? Only the collector or someone that adores neutrals and wants everything released from this shade range.My personal experience with this blogger was Nars Dual Intensity Callisto.She gave B+ but for me the eyeshadow is A+++++ so it's on everyones taste and personal preferences of how we like a product! (And i didnot like at all the washed out look she had created with Callisto Dione and Andromeda just for reference! ) because you cannot end up so washed out with so pigmented eyeshadows which are in my top 10 and i use regularly.Sorry for the long postit's always with every eye look i skipped something from chanel years ago after seeing her look it was so sheer you could barely see the colors. and then a year or two later i saw this quad at the counter and was so shocked how pigmented it was she doesn't use eye primer (stupid)
I agree!! Entrelacs isn't one of the best offerings from Chanel!! It is workable with a primer but without one it can be a lost cause!! :haha: the last 2 quints from Chanel has been a miss for me ( intemporels and Entrelacs) !! I still use them with a primer since I have both but looking back could have skipped both easily except for the pretty patterns lmao!! At the same time a lot of new shadows are moving towards silicon based derivatives which give them that creamy texture!! Those will perform better than the talc based ones without a primer!! Use of a primer will level the field to an extent!!if the same logic is applied to everything, blushes should probably be tested in bare skin and not over foundation!! At the end of the day it's a personal blog and I respect the decisions involved!! But I prefer the swatches/ pictures to the actual reviews because of the same!!I totally agree with you! She always states that she is rating products according to what the brand claims for the product but i think this is an old fashioned way of rating. Of course there are eye shadows that perform better even without a primer , (For Entrelacs i read a lot of rants from other bloggers too so i think that she is quite to the point for this product) and let's talk honestly now.if this palette(Entrelacs ) was not released from Chanel everyone would react like :"another neutral palette, i don't care! I have thousands of neutral palettes" All in all, My thought is Who is gonna pay 80 dollars for a Chanel palette that only 2 of the 5 eyeshadows are good and the rest mediocre? Only the collector or someone that adores neutrals and wants everything released from this shade range.My personal experience with this blogger was Nars Dual Intensity Callisto.She gave B+ but for me the eyeshadow is A+++++ so it's on everyones taste and personal preferences of how we like a product! (And i didnot like at all the washed out look she had created with Callisto Dione and Andromeda just for reference! ) because you cannot end up so washed out with so pigmented eyeshadows which are in my top 10 and i use regularly.Sorry for the long post
I notice she gave Pensive a D+ and says it is slightly drying and settles into lines. I like the shade from swatches I've seen on line but I have very dry lips so am wondering if I should get it or not. I don't really trust her reviews. And I'm curious how the ladies that have tried Pensive , found this particular RA? Thanks.
I personally found it more drying than the other RAs and the wear time was not as good. It's a nice shade for unpigmented lips. I think you can probably get a similar shade in another formula.Thanks Medgal, I also use lip balms on its own and under lipstick but my lips are still dry. One of the few lip products that I find actually improves the condition of my lips is the Dior Addict fluid stick. I'll have to try the Rouge Coco Baume. Thanks for the recommendation.
Thanks for your advice. I think I'll skip Pensive, and look for a similar shade in a different formula.I personally found it more drying than the other RAs and the wear time was not as good. It's a nice shade for unpigmented lips. I think you can probably get a similar shade in another formula.
Me too Vee! I respect and appreciate what she does even if I don't always agree with her findings. Especially since I don't think there is ANY blogger out there who has a swatch library and comparison as detailed as hers. I also appreciate that she includes pics of her bare lips next to the lip swatches and then also includes a full face as I find often times, it is difficult to really appreciate a shade from an upclose lip shot. My main qualm with her is that a lot of times she will swatch something and the swatch looks workable but then the eye look is just sheer and blended out into nothing-ness. The lighting doesn't bother me because I know it so well now that I self-adjust in my head! lol. That said, I look at the grades and the swatch pictures these days and do not really look at the ratings. If something is given an A, I will read to see why she gave it an A.At the same time a lot of new shadows are moving towards silicon based derivatives which give them that creamy texture!! Those will perform better than the talc based ones without a primer!! Use of a primer will level the field to an extent!!if the same logic is applied to everything, blushes should probably be tested in bare skin and not over foundation!! At the end of the day it's a personal blog and I respect the decisions involved!! But I prefer the swatches/ pictures to the actual reviews because of the same!!
I just don't think this particular one is a must-have, sorry.Thanks for your advice. I think I'll skip Pensive, and look for a similar shade in a different formula.
I was at the crucial point of buying Intemporel for collective reasons due to its symbolic release and the beautiful pattern with the 2.55 chain but i wasn't impressed by the swatches that i did myself on my skintone as very correctly Ashievic stated and there were so many great products at that time that i wanted to explore so i skipped! Now with the Entrelacs i find 80 dollars or 75 euros or 800 kr too much for a underperforming neutral palette but with a so beautiful pattern!!But then i will wait patiently to swatch it myself since i trust my eyes more than anyone's else!! As for the primer sometimes when i'm in a hurry i don't use one without any visible problem . In that case i prefer wearing eyeshadows that i know are pigmented so i will end up with a safe and sound look.and you are so right qbout the blush testing( no blush would be raved tested on bare skin due to natural redness or extra pale face which would totally change the final shade and performance) ! Of course i respect every blogger's opinion out there but then if i want one product desperately i search all the blogs , swatches and pics i can find and the final judgement is done on the counter! Except from some products that all you girls rave about so i buy blindly haha! I trust your judgement!I agree!! Entrelacs isn't one of the best offerings from Chanel!! It is workable with a primer but without one it can be a lost cause!! :haha: the last 2 quints from Chanel has been a miss for me ( intemporels and Entrelacs) !! I still use them with a primer since I have both but looking back could have skipped both easily except for the pretty patterns lmao!! At the same time a lot of new shadows are moving towards silicon based derivatives which give them that creamy texture!! Those will perform better than the talc based ones without a primer!! Use of a primer will level the field to an extent!!if the same logic is applied to everything, blushes should probably be tested in bare skin and not over foundation!! At the end of the day it's a personal blog and I respect the decisions involved!! But I prefer the swatches/ pictures to the actual reviews because of the same!!
I totally agree with youMe too Vee! I respect and appreciate what she does even if I don't always agree with her findings. Especially since I don't think there is ANY blogger out there who has a swatch library and comparison as detailed as hers. I also appreciate that she includes pics of her bare lips next to the lip swatches and then also includes a full face as I find often times, it is difficult to really appreciate a shade from an upclose lip shot. My main qualm with her is that a lot of times she will swatch something and the swatch looks workable but then the eye look is just sheer and blended out into nothing-ness. The lighting doesn't bother me because I know it so well now that I self-adjust in my head! lol. That said, I look at the grades and the swatch pictures these days and do not really look at the ratings. If something is given an A, I will read to see why she gave it an A.
:agree: one of the only reasons I keep checking her blog a few times a week.Me too Vee! I respect and appreciate what she does even if I don't always agree with her findings. Especially since I don't think there is ANY blogger out there who has a swatch library and comparison as detailed as hers. I also appreciate that she includes pics of her bare lips next to the lip swatches and then also includes a full face as I find often times, it is difficult to really appreciate a shade from an upclose lip shot. My main qualm with her is that a lot of times she will swatch something and the swatch looks workable but then the eye look is just sheer and blended out into nothing-ness. The lighting doesn't bother me because I know it so well now that I self-adjust in my head! lol. That said, I look at the grades and the swatch pictures these days and do not really look at the ratings. If something is given an A, I will read to see why she gave it an A.
But of course.Oh, well then I must purchase it right!
But of course.It will look amazing on your awesome nails!!!!
I fixed that for ya Sis!!!OHMY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I WE sooo NEED this!!!!!!!!!!!!