elegant-one
Well-known member
Its really pretty!!!
WAIT WHAT'S UP WITH THE AMOUNT?? 2.8 gr??? ISN'T 6 gr standard for JC??
:shock: omg yes!!!WAIT WHAT'S UP WITH THE AMOUNT?? 2.8 gr??? ISN'T 6 gr standard for JC??
:werd: It will be more than likely be the same. $45 is what the PR post mentioned!! hboy:hboy: Yup! They're cutting back on our chips, our toilet paper & now our blushes....cheap :sigh: What's the price on it?
$45 I'm embarrassed to say I really don't know how much they normally go for.hboy: Yup! They're cutting back on our chips, our toilet paper & now our blushes....cheap :sigh: What's the price on it?
I did look and some of JC's have been 4 g. Still 2.8 is pretty damn sad.WAIT WHAT'S UP WITH THE AMOUNT?? 2.8 gr??? ISN'T 6 gr standard for JC??
Yup yuere has been 4g and 6g versions based on it was baked formula or not but I think 2.8 is a first!! :sigh:I did look and some of JC's have been 4 g. Still 2.8 is pretty damn sad.
That's a bit disconcerting. A new lighter formula, maybe??Yup yuere has been 4g and 6g versions based on it was baked formula or not but I think 2.8 is a first!! :sigh:
Probably!! Somehow they manage to make it all look the same in the pan :haha: ! The jardin de camellia blush from this spring was 3g I think!!That's a bit disconcerting. A new lighter formula, maybe??
:nods: True!This will be their explanation - it's not a blush but highlighting blush so you will use less for smaller areas so you don't need as much product
That's the thing, right? I'm all, 'it looks the same.' It's very lovely looking, though, so I'll probably cave, rip off or no rip off. That's what they're counting on...Probably!! Somehow they manage to make it all look the same in the pan :haha: ! The jardin de camellia blush from this spring was 3g I think!!
I absolutely agree. I will probably get it , because it's really nice but i feel kind of betrayed. The price stays high but the amount of product is getting less and less. The Jardins de Camelia blush had 3g instead of 4 BUT it had that gorgeous flower pattern. This one however is just standard design. And compared to the Camelia de plumes Highlighter from last year which is at 8 g, this one is ridiculous.That's the thing, right? I'm all, 'it looks the same.' It's very lovely looking, though, so I'll probably cave, rip off or no rip off. That's what they're counting on...
I can help with this one. We had a problem for quite a while with spammers posting "ads" for kit---n renovation. It got to the point where we were clearing out entire threads every day. So now, the word is flagged in our system. When one of the moderators sees it, they can approve it manually, so it should post eventually.Just seen this. Not sure why that gets starred out. I used that word in a PM the other day and it did the same. Does anyone know why k i t c h e n is considered a dirty word on this site?
That's exactly what I thought when I first read that it was a highlighting blush.This will be their explanation - it's not a blush but highlighting blush so you will use less for smaller areas so you don't need as much product
Is it at all possible that these were samples sizes sent out to bloggers? It's ok to hope, right