Originally Posted by xxmissjennyxx kinda makes me wish MAC stayed independent |
Originally Posted by Isabelle I would have never planned my first proper hauls from a collection, Lingerie and Culturebloom, if I hadn't been able to see the pictures beforehand. There is no MAC near me, and I can only order by mail order - no way I'm going to do that without seeing the pictures. I'm really disappointed about this, and if there is no way to get pictures beforehand, I definitely won't be buying as much in future. Isabelle |
Originally Posted by Janice While Estee counsel are considerate of our goodwill and nature toward it's subsidiary, it still has to protect the rights of it's images. It is my opinion they have special focus on cracking down on internet "leaks" of their new products/ideas right now. I have to pick and choose my fights, and I can't take on Estee Lauder. Sorry girls! Specktra.Net will always work to bring you the latest MAC color story news, but for the time being we will not be able to share with you the promotional images usually accompanied with those details. (though I'm sure they'll pop up somewhere |
Originally Posted by MAC_Whore Hi Janice- |
Originally Posted by MAC_Whore I can appreciate what EL is saying, but hey, I don't have to be pleased about it. |
Originally Posted by MAC_Whore I can imagine what going against a corp behemoth like EL would be like, so I see the position you are in. This is really unfortunate for Specktra-ites. |
Originally Posted by MAC_Whore I just wanted to clarify something. Is Specktra able to post colour story images after MAC has launched it or is EL forbidding all images, regardless of whether it is post or pre-launch timeframe? Just asking as the Colour Stories area is a great resource. Thanks! |
Originally Posted by FlaLadyB does that mean we can STILL POST PICS INSIDE ....but not on Color Stories.....???? |
Originally Posted by a914butterfly why is estee lauder doing this??? seeing the color stories make us want to buy the products. if we dont see it, we dont know if we want to buy it since we dont know what it will look like. this isn't good for business. most of anyone's business relies on advertising. |
Originally Posted by martygreene The short explanation of it is this: the images, etc. are copyright material. EL owns that copyright. Copyright law protects those materials. Hosting said materials on Specktra is a violation of copyright law. |
Originally Posted by Ambi If you'd take a picture of the images with a digicam and put those up there, would that still be violating the copyright law? Haha, I'm always looking for loopholes... |
Originally Posted by mellimello Yeah, it'd still be a violation, as far as I know. Since the image would still be the same and it's still EL's property, there's no real loophole to get around copyright law and all that stuff |
Originally Posted by 'Nessa There's no loop hole but a company can give your rights to their material for a price.... |