Department Stores and Cosmetic Companys Cheated Us- SO we get free makeup!

blindpassion

Well-known member
Hey all. Thought you might find this interesting, if theres a thread about this already, I'm sorry! I haven't seen anything yet.

According to these sets of articles (links below) all of you wonderful US citizens are entitled to 25$ worth of free make-up. (totally worth it.)

I'm not sure of all the details, so far from what I've read, it seems that department stores and cosmetic companies were price fixing, and a class action suite was filled against them all and now they have to give back 175$ million worth of products.

Heres the links... the last link (Cosmetics Settlement - Information Website) is the most legitimate site and is the place where you enter your information to receive your settlement.


Links:
http://nymag.com/daily/fashion/2008/08/department_stores_and_cosmetic.html
http://consumerist.com/5038107/class-action-settlement-sets-up-massive-cosmetics-giveaway
http://www.cosmeticssettlement.com/





Source: Department Stores and Cosmetic Companies Cheated Us, So We Get Free Makeup! -- The Cut: New York Magazine's Fashion Blog
Quote:
Beauty Marks

8/18/08

5:35 PM


Department Stores and Cosmetic Companies Cheated Us, So We Get Free Makeup!

18_giantmessofproducts_lg.jpg



Guilty as charged.Photo: Courtesy of Prescriptives, Clinique, CK, M.A.C, Chanel

We hate legalese as much as the rest of you, but when we heard about the possibility of free makeup, we jumped headfirst into the jargon. And here's what we found out: Department stores like Macy's, Bloomingdale's, Filene's, Lord & Taylor, Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom, and Saks Fifth Avenue cheated consumers by making a pact that they'd only sell cosmetic products at the suggested retail price. By doing so, there is no competition between stores, no discounts, and the consumer loses out. It's called price fixing, and it's a violation of antitrust laws, if you want to sound cool. And it happened with big cosmetics brands, too! CK One, CK Be, Eternity, Chanel No. 5, M.A.C, Clinique, and Prescriptives were all involved. And more.
The news of the settlement is old hat, with judges ordering this is 2004. But now, finally, the stores and companies are paying for it. The stores are ordered to give away $175 million worth of products starting in 2009, a mere four and a half months away. Plus, they have to pay almost $24 million in attorney fees. (They're also never allowed to engage in price-fixing again, but that's pretty much a given.)
And come 2009, the giveaway begins! Don't lose out on what you're entitled to. And free makeup is free makeup. Here's how to score your own $25 worth:
1. Sign a form that says you purchased the covered products between May 29, 1994, and July 16, 2003, and you're a resident of the United States.
2. Enter in your e-mail and mailing address here or call 877-604-5776 to leave your name and mailing address.
3. Wait for the alert that tells you you're eligible.
4. Then get $25 worth of free makeup!
Learning the law never felt so beautiful.
 

NicksWifey

Well-known member
Ok, maybe it's just me, but even with my high speed internet & fast computer, the link on the cosmetics settlement page to leave my info will not work, hmmm.
 

blindpassion

Well-known member
Theres a phone number you can call
smiles.gif
Its in the article I quoted.
The email thing worked for me after a few tries.
 

blindpassion

Well-known member
Quote:
Originally Posted by nursee81
i think the deadline is over


I dont believe so. That news article that I quoted in my post, and gives the phone number and website, was from August 18th, 2008... yesterday.

The lawsuit is over...
But if you are or maybe aren't familiar with those types of things, usually it takes the companies a year or two to comply with the ruling. As of 2009, they are following the ruling. (and giving away the products.)
 

hhunt2

Well-known member
Quote:
Originally Posted by blindpassion
I dont believe so. That news article that I quoted in my post, and gives the phone number and website, was from August 18th, 2008... yesterday.

The lawsuit is over...
But if you are or maybe aren't familiar with those types of things, usually it takes the companies a year or two to comply with the ruling. As of 2009, they are following the ruling. (and giving away the products.)


Yea... why would the Class Action Lawsuit be mentioned on national news on Aug. 18, 2008 and say that the start of the claiming process would be in the beginning of 2009? I defenitly think the lawsuit is still open. The settlement website might say "Last updated on December 13, 2007" but there's always holes in the system.

I've been through a class action lawsuit with Abercrombie & Fitch a few years back. The lawsuit lasted for maybe 2 years, then I recieved $2,000 in the mail.
Don't under estimate a Class Action Lawsuit... it may take up to several years to settle.
 

blindpassion

Well-known member
Quote:
Originally Posted by esmeralda89
soooo..... what if you didint buy makeup in those years can you still do it?


I doubt theres many women in the US who haven't purchased makeup sometime between May 29, 1994, and July 16, 2003...


Thats 9 years.
 

esmeralda89

Well-known member
Quote:
Originally Posted by blindpassion
I doubt theres many women in the US who haven't purchased makeup sometime between May 29, 1994, and July 16, 2003...


Thats 9 years.


thanks but do you think people like myself (18, 4yrs in 94 and 13 in 03) could apply i myself didint buy in those years but my mom did and honestly who wouldent like to receve free makeup? (me!!)
th_DANCE.gif
 

blindpassion

Well-known member
Quote:
Originally Posted by esmeralda89
thanks but do you think people like myself (18, 4yrs in 94 and 13 in 03) could apply i myself didint buy in those years but my mom did and honestly who wouldent like to receve free makeup? (me!!)
th_DANCE.gif


You could just ask your mom to apply
smiles.gif
maybe she'd do that?
 

twilightessence

Well-known member
It says the judgement was made in 2004. I read this on LJ and some of the girls remembered it, but they said its old. It seems like a site took the article, miss read it and posted it as new to me...
 
Top