I'm almost hoping they are because now I want Deep Love 2005. lolYes, that is why I am not sure if they are going to be close
I knowBut I'm happy about this collection and can't wait. October is sooo far away.
Here's Sin on me. I love it.
It won't be too orange for you, trust me. And i highly recomment NOT using Emphasize for under your eyes to set your concealer. What Jaclyn doesn't tell you is that this is far to shimmery for that. Accentuate won't work either for your skintone. Just use your regular face powder. The undereye area shouldn't even be highlighted (i can't stress this enough!). It's not a naturally highlighted part of the face anyway, so putting a highlight there looks unnatural, photographs weirdly, and really just needs to die off yesterday (thankfully it's slowly disappearing, but not fast enough). Sorry.Is this Emphasize and Bone Beige? Looks like I will be skipping that duo. Bone Beige almost leans orange. Maybe my phone? Plus I have Sculpt from Malificent. I really wanted Emphasize to use to set/highlight my undereye area. Jaclyn Hill on YT uses it all the time. It seems like it would be too shiny/frosty (can't think of the right word) to use it like that. Would you recommend Accentuate instead for my complexion? I think that's what I'm going to do rather than pick up the duo. I really just wanted it for the shaping powder. The sculpting powder would just be another option if I didn't want to use Sculpt. Which shaping powder do you recommend for someone NW/NC 15 leaning more neutral? You've helped make my decision! Pan form it is!
It is based off of it, so...I know that "Deep Love" is a WN but I still have a lipstick called "Deep Love" from many years ago. And I wonder if the RHPS "Deep Love" could be close :dunno:
I've mentioned yesterday what WN means.Not to sound silly but that means the name can change?
They aren't reusing the name.Yeah, I was about to say that DEEP LOVE from that time frame is brown. I own it. In fact, it was a permanent color until a couple of years ago so I am surprised they are already reusing the name and with such a different color as well.
I thought I was the only one thinking that. It is very shimmery IMO, the shimmer particles a very small, but there a lots of 'em.They aren't reusing the name.
I hope it's not this, it's one of the only colors I'm interested in and I can't wear browns at all
Very pretty!Here's Sin on me. I love it.
I'm thinking it'll look more like a glass of red wine.I hope it's not this, it's one of the only colors I'm interested in and I can't wear browns at all
This old Deep Love doesn't look brown to me. It looks like a deep deep wine. Someone else called it a plum. It's my kind of color, but i have way too many of them. And, in any event, we know the new lipstick will have a different name and it'll probably look different, too...I hope it's not this, it's one of the only colors I'm interested in and I can't wear browns at all
Thank you!Very pretty!
I can't wear anything with even the slightest hint of brown so I think my brown radar is just more up lol wine to me is like DivaThis old Deep Love doesn't look brown to me. It looks like a deep deep wine. Someone else called it a plum. It's my kind of color, but i have way too many of them. And, in any event, we know the new lipstick will have a different name and it'll probably look different, too...
Maybe it's my monitor or something, it looks kinda like a several shades lighter and slightly redder version of Film Noir to me on my work comp. :/This old Deep Love doesn't look brown to me. It looks like a deep deep wine. Someone else called it a plum. It's my kind of color, but i have way too many of them. And, in any event, we know the new lipstick will have a different name and it'll probably look different, too...
Oh no, it's highly shimmery, which is why it's a great highlighter, and not a setting powder.I thought I was the only one thinking that. It is very shimmery IMO, the shimmer particles a very small, but there a lots of 'em.
Yeah i see no brown either :shrugs:This old Deep Love doesn't look brown to me. It looks like a deep deep wine. Someone else called it a plum. It's my kind of color, but i have way too many of them. And, in any event, we know the new lipstick will have a different name and it'll probably look different, too...
Thanks Erine!! You just saved me some money and looking like a disco ball! Based on Jacyln Hills videos it just looked like something really nice to set and subtly brighten that area. After I saw your swatch though I can't believe anyone would want to put that under the eyes. Definitely looks like a regular highlighter. I use the BP from Malificent to set my undereye area right now. Seems to work really well but I'm always looking for something new and pretty! And you definitely get sucked into things watching YT videos!!It won't be too orange for you, trust me. And i highly recomment NOT using Emphasize for under your eyes to set your concealer. What Jaclyn doesn't tell you is that this is far to shimmery for that. Accentuate won't work either for your skintone. Just use your regular face powder. The undereye area shouldn't even be highlighted (i can't stress this enough!). It's not a naturally highlighted part of the face anyway, so putting a highlight there looks unnatural, photographs weirdly, and really just needs to die off yesterday (thankfully it's slowly disappearing, but not fast enough). Sorry. It is based off of it, so... I've mentioned yesterday what WN means. They aren't reusing the name.