Religion is (or at least *should* be) a very personal thing. I don't mind seeing someone's work station festooned with their religious symbol(s) of choice. I actually see it quite frequently, and sorry to disappoint those who think their beliefs are being "attacked" in America, but nobody is asked to take anything down. One of the employees at my daughter's pediatrician's office is a Jehovah's Witness. She's got pictures of Jesus everywhere, and copies of that Watchtower magazine scattered on her desk. Nobody minds, because that's her belief, therefore her business.
Now I'm sure that, if she were proselytizing, or insulting anyone else's beliefs, she'd be asked to stop. But, as it is, nobody bothers her about it.
Also, I just looked on my calender, and it looks like Easter and Christmas still exist in America, so I'm not really seeing this intense persecution that people are implying. You want persecution? Look no further than the Federal Marriage Amendment, the recent Ohio abortion ban proposal, or the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy. Those are just a few examples of true persecution in America. This country has freedom of religion, therefore you are *not* persecuted for your beliefs at all. Your beliefs just aren't being catered to, and they shouldn't be. Separation of church and state, wot wot.
Also, to the person who felt persecuted as a Christian because "once a Christian states a belief, and explains the belief, s/he is attacked for 'trying to convert' someone else," please note that the orignal poster *did* say that her cousin told her the person was "preaching." Preaching tends to mean that yes, they were proselytizing. (I do realize that different people have different ideas of what constitutes preaching, but since we don't know the person who used the word, we have only the use of the word to go on. Therefore, I am speaking from the assumption that she meant the word as the dictionary defines it.)
It's not that atheists, agnostics, or just non-Christians in general are ignorant or scared of Christian beliefs. It's that they're human beings too, and as such, don't really want to hear a contrary opinion/belief when they've already made up their mind. I'm not saying that's always a good thing, but it's a thing no human being on this planet is immune from. Seriously, everyone gets like that sometimes. I've no doubt some "persecuted majority" types reading my post will get upset, because they didn't want to hear that someone else doesn't agree that their belief system is under attack. It's human nature.
Anyway, I hope I didn't offend anybody too badly. I've said my peace, and probably won't come back to the thread after this. I just wanted to offer a different viewpoint. The view of an outsider, who reads about different forms of persecution on a regular basis. I'm a big fan of fighting persecution, and I'm really sorry, but "holiday trees" and separation of church and state do *not* strike me as true persecution. It's not actually robbing you of anything, or infringing on your right to still pray and call a Christmas tree a Christmas tree.
FWIW, I call it a Christmas tree, but perhaps mainly because it's what I'm used to calling it. Human nature, once again.
ETA: Also, to the person who said there's nothing in the Constitution about the separation of church and state? You're right, in a sense. It's actually in the Bill of Rights. Look it up, it's called the Establishment Clause. I'm surprised someone would argue against church and state separation with such certainty before even doing the most basic of google searches. No offense, it just struck me as odd that you didn't look it up first to make sure you were stating a fact.