Quote:
Originally Posted by lara
Foundation is a luxury. No one is ever obligated to buy luxuries.
|
That's your opinion. Plus I put "obligated" in quotation marks so that people would know I don't equate it with food, water, and shelter...but I guess people didn't understand that.
Foundation was not a luxury for me as a teen. It was a "necessity". Would I die without it? No, but you wouldn't die if nobody loved you either. And most people still regard love as a "necessity".
Why does Locks of Love exist? Because providing wigs for children who suffer from medical conditions (as acne is also a medical condition) such as cancer and alopecia is regarded as a "necessity" even though we wouldn't put weaves/wigs in the average child's hair. Would they die without it? No, but would you make your kid that's undergoing chemo go to school bald?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shimmer
"Obligated"?
Yeah. no.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TISH1127
With proper skin care...a teenager should not even need foundation.....If they are covering a problem..maybe a dermatologist may be a better solution. Wants and needs are two different things.
|
Again, I guess people didn't understand the meaning of quotation marks around a word.
Well, the $100s of dollars in bills from the dermatologist, pharmacist, and skincare aisle that was spent on my behalf as a teen (and I still had horrible skin) contradict that statement.
Skin issues are known to cause clinical depression. Teen already suffer from terrible self-esteem and teasing. Acne & scars just add onto that.
I have very sensitive skin and had to use quality, department store foundations (as recommended by my derm) that wouldn't further exacerbate my skin issues to cover the red marks & post-acne hyperpigmentation issues that often plague WOC while I underwent treatments.
I guess I'm blessed that I had a sensitive, caring mother who saw this as a necessity for me. I'd do the same for my child.