Not for the weak!! Caution. **STRONGLY ADVISE CAUTION** /admin

[lara]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evey I saw a vid one time that someone posted in another forum i used to be a part of. It was of this girl giving a guy head and he grabs her by her ears and pulls her forward and she just throws up all over his **** and he just continues to push her back and forth until he finishes....i thought it was pretty disgusting... I don't see how you could continue to get off on that after someone just threw up all over you...but that's just me.

You'd be surprised at how common emetophilia is on the scale of fetishes. Actually, you'd be surprised at how common a lot of supposedly far-out fetishes are. Grab yourself a copy of the Kinsey Reports one day if you want to be boggled by the creative sexual fetishes of repressed 1950's America, then imagine what else it would contain now in liberalised 2007!

 

[Ms.Amaranthine]

I'm a very curious person. I've gone to gore websites like SnuffX for about seven years. I'm desensitized. I look at dead things whilst I eat. I can be affected morally, but none of it is too gross or disgusting for me. In theory, 2 Girls, 1 Cup is gross, sure.. but..

Take it from somebody that's seen all kinds of nasty stuff all over the internet.. I believe this video is fake.

There's only been two sexual-esque/fetish videos that've really made me cringe and say "What the f***!". One is on SnuffX and it's of a guy putting maggots inside his penis and the other is on Consumption Junction and it has to do with anal prolapse.

Oh well. Being morbidly curious about everything means that you must see everything at least once. What people are capable of is fascinating to me!

 

[iheartcolor]

Quote:

Originally Posted by lipshock Especially when the word vomiting was brought up. My EMETOPHOBIA would go into overdrive if I ever watched the clips.

Me too! Emetophobics unite!!!! As soon as I saw this - I did not watch the video for this *exact* reason! I am glad that I am not the only one who would have an utter panic attack at the viewing of these....

-Lauren

 

[iheartcolor]

I am utterly appalled and distraught that this is on YouTube - viewable by anyone. Since I refuse to watch these - does one have to be 18 or something to be able to view them? Like an adult version of YouTube? Or can an 8 year old get on there and find it?

-Lauren

 

[CaraAmericana]

Quote:

Originally Posted by iheartcolor I am utterly appalled and distraught that this is on YouTube - viewable by anyone. Since I refuse to watch these - does one have to be 18 or something to be able to view them? Like an adult version of YouTube? Or can an 8 year old get on there and find it? -Lauren

It is people's reactions only. Not the actual video.

 

[Shimmer]

Quote:

Originally Posted by iheartcolor I am utterly appalled and distraught that this is on YouTube - viewable by anyone. Since I refuse to watch these - does one have to be 18 or something to be able to view them? Like an adult version of YouTube? Or can an 8 year old get on there and find it? -Lauren

Adult videos are flagged on youtube as requiring age verification.

 

[NutMeg]

Quote:

Originally Posted by iheartcolor I am utterly appalled and distraught that this is on YouTube - viewable by anyone. Since I refuse to watch these - does one have to be 18 or something to be able to view them? Like an adult version of YouTube? Or can an 8 year old get on there and find it? -Lauren

I don't think an eight year old should have unrestricted access to a computer. Parents shouldn't depend on the integrity of a website to protect their children from graphic and inappropriate content. Not that I'm saying that you are one of those people, but that's just my opinion.

 

[CaraAmericana]

what? but who said that?

 

[NutMeg]

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaraAmericana what? but who said that?

Not sure if this was directed at me but I'll take it anyway.

I wasn't trying to imply that the previous poster either did allow eight year olds unrestricted computer access, or that they condoned it (which I thought was sufficiently stated in my post but I guess not). I just thought that the phrasing of the previous post implied that it would be the website's (in this case YouTube) fault if eight year olds got their hands on a video like this. My point is that no parent should be relying on the website to monitor what their child has access to online. Hope that cleared things up, and sorry if that wasn't directed at me.

 

[captodometer]

Didn't watch any of the videos, but read the descriptions. Nothing illegal about any of them. Gross, yes. Illegal, no. Everyone in the videos consented, regardless of what the incentive was.

 

[Nekura]

I've actually never seen that video till today but I've seen reference to the name of it (2girls1cup) for a while without knowing what it is...

While it's obnoxiously repulsive, I'm pretty sure it's real. It's actual just a disturbing sexual fetish sometimes referred to as SCAT. I've known about this before hand because there are some old punk shops here in the city I live in that sell some strange graphic tshirts (it's a vintage shop so I'm not sure where those are from or when) that has had photos of this type... of "interaction". One of my old friends used to be really disgusted by it that I did some research on sh*t eating to see if it was indeed real and if ... even worst, a "common" type thing <- since these images were on shirts!

Apparently SCAT isn't that uncommon <- HOW DISTURBING IS THIS. However the normal world was not prepared to be exposed to it but I'm sure there are other disturbing, unsanitary, and odd fetishes out there.

 

[CaraAmericana]

Quote:

Originally Posted by NutMeg Not sure if this was directed at me but I'll take it anyway. I wasn't trying to imply that the previous poster either did allow eight year olds unrestricted computer access, or that they condoned it (which I thought was sufficiently stated in my post but I guess not). I just thought that the phrasing of the previous post implied that it would be the website's (in this case YouTube) fault if eight year olds got their hands on a video like this. My point is that no parent should be relying on the website to monitor what their child has access to online. Hope that cleared things up, and sorry if that wasn't directed at me.

My apologies Nutmeg/Iheartcolor! I had thought there was a third post that had came first and I couldn't understand what I was missing. But there wasn't so it was my misunderstanding.

 

[Evey]

Quote:

Originally Posted by lara Gagging and forced deep-throating is getting really, really common in hetero porn. I find that more of a turn-off than 2 Girls 1 Cup, to be honest. One I can completely disassociate from and look at it more or less objectively (it's peanut butter and chocolate pudding!), the other just makes me cringe and gag sympathetically. If you can deep-throat with ease and/or practice, all the more power to you. The thought of someone grabbing my ears and forcibly jamming their wang past my tonsils makes me gag.

exactly...i would probably bite it off if someone ever did that to me....


It just seems so wrong to me...I'm like WTF!!?? and he just keeps going...she doesnt just gag...she throws up all over him....it's rather disgusting...not only because she throws up but just the fact that he doesn't care and continues to gag her after she throws up.

 

[iheartcolor]

Quote:

Originally Posted by NutMeg I wasn't trying to imply that the previous poster either did allow eight year olds unrestricted computer access, or that they condoned it (which I thought was sufficiently stated in my post but I guess not). I just thought that the phrasing of the previous post implied that it would be the website's (in this case YouTube) fault if eight year olds got their hands on a video like this. My point is that no parent should be relying on the website to monitor what their child has access to online.

I was merely asking a question that came up in my mind since many a child DOES indeed have unrestricted or unsupervised internet time.

-Lauren

 

[iheartcolor]

Quote:

Originally Posted by NutMeg I don't think an eight year old should have unrestricted access to a computer. Parents shouldn't depend on the integrity of a website to protect their children from graphic and inappropriate content. Not that I'm saying that you are one of those people, but that's just my opinion.

I do not have any children, but I agree : I would never allow the internet to be a babysitter. But kids do have ways to do things without a parent knowing.

-Lauren

 

[iheartcolor]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shimmer Adult videos are flagged on youtube as requiring age verification.

What age verification does YouTube have? "Click here if you are over 18"?

-Lauren

 

[Shimmer]

Quote:

Originally Posted by iheartcolor What age verification does YouTube have? "Click here if you are over 18"? -Lauren

It's not youtube's, specktra's, myspace's, or any other website's JOB to make sure a child isn't browsing inappropriate content on its site. It's the job of the person in charge to make sure of the child's viewing habits being in line with the child's age and maturity level.
myspace is blocked on my daughter's computer, youtube was blocked, that's my job as her parent. If my kids are viewing something and click on 18+ saying they're 18, that's still on me, not on the website.

 

[iheartcolor]

I understand that a website has no power or jurisdiction over who views their content. Sorry for ruffling some feathers.

-Lauren

 

[Shimmer]

No ruffling at all.

 

[Beauty Mark]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nekura I've actually never seen that video till today but I've seen reference to the name of it (2girls1cup) for a while without knowing what it is... While it's obnoxiously repulsive, I'm pretty sure it's real. It's actual just a disturbing sexual fetish sometimes referred to as SCAT. I've known about this before hand because there are some old punk shops here in the city I live in that sell some strange graphic tshirts (it's a vintage shop so I'm not sure where those are from or when) that has had photos of this type... of "interaction". One of my old friends used to be really disgusted by it that I did some research on sh*t eating to see if it was indeed real and if ... even worst, a "common" type thing <- since these images were on shirts! Apparently SCAT isn't that uncommon <- HOW DISTURBING IS THIS. However the normal world was not prepared to be exposed to it but I'm sure there are other disturbing, unsanitary, and odd fetishes out there.

While it's not my cup of tea and I do question the consent aspect of this video, as well as sanitation aspects of scat play, I'm not sure if disturbing is the right word. I find people who get off on damn near dying more disturbing. To me, that's just so dangerous and likely being fueled by mental disease

Wikipedia has a great list of all sorts of fetishes.