"Skinny Model Ban" in Madrid

Status
Not open for further replies.

Raerae

Well-known member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shimmer
I know that I personally am for HEALTHY bodies (Gabrielle Reese, Maria Sharipova, Anna Kournikova before she started scarfnbarfing) and I get the impression from many of the members here that they are also of that opinion. Healthy is beautiful. Over/underweight isn't healthy.

Translation: I'm for bodies that look like my own. And am unhappy with the current "standard of beauty" that is portrayed in the media, fashion, etc industries, because it is not that of my own. This isn't about healthy or un-healthy, but about wanting the beauty standard to be reflective of my own personal appearance.
 

Shimmer

Well-known member
That would be an incorrect translation.

It's entirely possible to be a healthy size zero.
It's entirely possible to be a healthy size ten.
I'm for both.
I am not, however, for glorifying scarfnbarfing, fasting, or unhealthy ideals, nor am I for rewarding unhealthy behaviour with millions of dollars of contracts etc.

Be quite sure of what I said before putting words into my mouth, or speaking for me, as I assure you, your attempt at translating my post failed miserably.
 

Raerae

Well-known member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shimmer
.Be quite sure of what I said before putting words into my mouth, or speaking for me, as I assure you, your attempt at translating my post failed miserably.

Pot Kettal Black?
 

Shimmer

Well-known member
Hardly.

You yourself have stated numerous times in this thread that there are women who look healthy and are thin, and there are women who are healthy and are thin.

I'm for that, I've never denied that.

I'm not for, and never will be for, unhealthy behaviour to achieve a certain look.

By your opposition to that statement, one can safely infer that you are for unhealthy behaviour, as long as the ends justify the means. If this is not correct, please state your position more clearly.
 

Shimmer

Well-known member
Then perhaps you shouldn't have quoted that one? Regardless, don't misunderstand my stance on both the standards for the Madrid shows and the idea of body image in general.
 

Hawkeye

Well-known member
So basically you are saying you want under/overweight?

I gotta admit, I've followed this thread and I'm so confused over what is actually being said about the topic. Nothing really has been very productive to come out of this that actually mean anything to the topic itself IMHO

raerae- I mean all your saying is Beauty is in the eye of the beholder but the topic itself is some folks in madrid decided that they, as a soverign nation did not like the fact that skinny models gave the impression of unhealth.

Quite frankly, I don't think Shimmer is saying what your translation is. It seems to me that your trying to twist her words to make yourself sound right. And that doesn't seem right to me.

I don't think you are Hearing what is being said and if you are then you aren't understanding, and if you are understanding then I think you are now at the point of arguing just for the sake of argument.

This is how it is broken down:
There are people with eating disorders-they get skinny they get super skinny and at some point it begins to kill them.

There are people who are naturally tiny-but they are indeed healthy.

There are people at a healthy "avg" weight that are healthy

There are people at a healthy weight that aren't healthy

There are people who are overweight and are healthy for them
there are people who are overweight and its not healthy.

That's basically the break down of the thread. Pure and simple. We've argued over the above for weeks and really there is nothing to argue except nit picking over a persons percieved beauty and what is actually healthy.

Do I agree with the ban? Personally no but its in madrid and not america.

Do I agree with the concept that maybe having really skinny people may be a bad idea if you want to promote a healthy image? Yes. And if they do happen to do this they should bring out people who are at a healthy weight.

And it's not about what shimmer percieves to be good and its not about what you percieve to be good or beautiful and its not what I percieve to be good or beautiful.

It's about Health.

I don't think they are going about it the best way but its Madrid not the US

I just am baffled that this thread has gone on for ten pages and has said nothing but the exact same thing. It's gone in circles! Basically and I know some people here may think im picking on them and I hope they don't but at this point I'm more ranting than anything.

Rant over-im off my soap box

=)
With that being said........

and for amusement purposes
nars.jpg
 

Raerae

Well-known member
Quote:
Originally Posted by youbeabitch
I think you are now at the point of arguing just for the sake of argument.

rofl.gif


Caught red handed!

lol...

However this is also a internet thread, so we have a lot of little threads (derails) going on at the same time, talking about diff things. Which is why the thread is all over the place.

Personally I enjoy these types of threads because we get to talk about many diff threads all at once. But that would take moderation forcing the topic to stay on topic. And those threads are never very fun.
 

Raerae

Well-known member
Quote:
Originally Posted by youbeabitch
Well as long as I now know whats going on so I can follow the thread i'm a happy camper LOL

I can draw you a flow chart if you need it.
rofl.gif
 

redambition

Well-known member
Quote:
Originally Posted by little teaser
im not saying that people with severe anorexic dont have heath problems but if it's that severe i dont think employers would have to ban or give them time to get "better" because the person would probley be to sick to walk in to work to begain with just like severe obest people who cant peform at work wouldnt be able to walk to there car or even get out of bed and how often do you see a anorexic in your every day life running around that looks like they need to be in the hospital?? i hardly ever and when i do it's drug related but almost everyday that i go out either to work shopping out to eat or whatever i see a over weight person that does not look healthy but still function in there job's

i understand where you are coming from here. i'll clarify my point a little.

it is possible for someone to be unhealthy or sick (for whatever reason) and for them to still be able to function at their job. however, if a manager or colleague simply takes the point of view that if someone can do their work = they must be ok then that manager or colleague has a problem.

people are not robots. (some managers keep forgetting this important fact.) someone could be suffering so much inside, be it emotionally or physically, but if they have a strong work ethic then they will simply keep coming in to work and doing the best job they can.

i don't think it's ok for employers to ignore the fact that sometimes their employees might need a little encouragement to take some time out which they do actually need. good employers don't begrudge sick leave or holiday leave because they know that it's there to ensure their employees are fit and well to work. no one can work all the time without needing a holiday from work, or without needing to take some time off to recover from an illness from time to time.

a good manager might notice you look constantly tired and stressed out, then ask you if you have any holiday leave booked. if you don't (and they know you haven't taken any in a while), then they might suggest you think about taking some. they don't tell you to do it, they don't force you.. they just plant that seed of thought. it's a similar situation to someone who looks unwell. there's nothing stopping your manager asking if you're ok. again, they don't have to push you to take time off (though if you are obviously sick they might have to), but the thought is planted in your head and you start thinking about whether you should actually take the sick leave if you need it.

i was trying to apply that type of mentality to the discussion in the thread.. sorry if i did not explain it clearly.
 

Raerae

Well-known member
Quote:
Originally Posted by redambition
people are not robots. (some managers keep forgetting this important fact.) someone could be suffering so much inside, be it emotionally or physically, but if they have a strong work ethic then they will simply keep coming in to work and doing the best job they can.

A lot of managers also dont pry into people's personal lives. Or just dont know enough about someone (depending on how large of a staff they are supervising) to comment on their physical or mental state. As a former manager I know my job was to evaluate a persons job performance, no more, no less. Not play shrink to the plethoria of employees who were dealing with emotional or other issues. We were also encouraged by our HR departments not to get involved.

Thats why many employers provide some sort of health care to employees who are working fulltime. If they are "suffering so much inside" they can use their insurance and see a doctor or psycologist. And the professional, who is better qualified to make a judgement call on an individuals mental and physical state with regards to their ability to work, can suggest them reducing hours or taking time off.
 

little teaser

Well-known member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shimmer
Indeed. Many of the posts here are almost "pro-ana" in nature, and that's a huge concern based on the fact that we have many members who simply LURK the thread(s) who may be trying to recover from eating disorders or who are struggling with coping with an eating disorder and when they see some of this argument, I can honestly see how it can be considered a setback.

That said, I do want to point out that at no point in this time has anyone validated or expressed the opinion that "It's OK to be overweight" in regard to the subject.
I know that I personally am for HEALTHY bodies (Gabrielle Reese, Maria Sharipova, Anna Kournikova before she started scarfnbarfing) and I get the impression from many of the members here that they are also of that opinion. Healthy is beautiful. Over/underweight isn't healthy.


just curious why do you think anna kournikova is scarfnbarfing i havent heard those rumors maybe she is doing drugs who knows since we dont know her but is it fair to asume someone has a eating disorder if they are skinny i dont go around and asume someone eats to much if there overweight theres no telling why a person is the way they are to asume is starting rumors when we dont have facts and i dont disagree with everything that you have said you have made good points so calm down shimmer your not speaking to deaf ears
 

Raerae

Well-known member
Are you talking?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070124/...shion_campaign

MADRID, Spain - Spain's government has reached an agreement with major fashion designers, including the owner of the Zara chain, to standardize women's clothing sizes with the aim of promoting a healthier image.

ADVERTISEMENT

Designers such as Cortefiel, Mango, El Corte Ingles and Inditex, which owns Zara, agreed to take part in the program, which was announced Tuesday.

The program, designed by the Health Ministry, will also prevent those companies from using window displays featuring clothes smaller than a European size 38 (10 in Britain, 8 in the United States). They will have five years to phase in the change.

"It is not reasonable for a modern and advanced society to establish stereotypes of beauty that are far removed from the social reality of a community. It is everyone's commitment that beauty and health go hand in hand," Health Minister Elena Salgado said at a signing ceremony Tuesday.

The agreement follows last year's unprecedented decision by Spain's main fashion show, Madrid's Pasarela Cibeles, to ban some models from the catwalk on grounds they were too thin, saying this looked encouraged eating disorders among young people.

The Health Ministry's program aims to end a situation in which a woman who buys a size 40 dress from one designer may not fit in a size 40 garment from another designer. The ministry said the differences sometimes lead women to feel compelled to lose weight.

Designers should be encouraged to "promote a healthy physical image that conforms with the reality of the Spanish population," the ministry said in a statement.

The agreement also stipulates that European size 46 no longer be specifically labeled as a larger size.

As part of the effort to standardize sizes, the ministry plans to measure 8,500 Spanish girls and women between the ages of 12 and 70 to determine the true shapes of Spanish women's bodies.

---------------------------------------------

Ok... I think making the sizes standard is fine... It's annoying sometimes to grab your "size" and find it's too big or too small... But is it really that big of a deal? I think people are taking this whole thing WAY to far.

Quote:
The program, designed by the Health Ministry, will also prevent those companies from using window displays featuring clothes smaller than a European size 38 (10 in Britain, 8 in the United States). They will have five years to phase in the change.

Is this really necessary? Study finds window displays contribute to anarexia in women! Tune in at 6 on Channel 5! I mean c'mon, it's a doll. Everyone on this board agreed that Barbie with her unrealistic proportions had zero effect on their self image. Manequins are just life size barbies. I've never once looked at a manequin and been like OMG she's so skinny! I know in wet seal we put size 4's on our manequins because the clothing had to get around the hips on the doll. When did size 4 suddenly promote anarexia? Granted I'm sure some are slimmer, but whats the big deal? It's just a doll...

Quote:
"It is not reasonable for a modern and advanced society to establish stereotypes of beauty that are far removed from the social reality of a community.

So far removed? Maybe if the "modern and advanced societies" weren't statistically obese, the social realities of the community wouldn't see a manequin as overly skinnny.

Quote:
The Health Ministry's program aims to end a situation in which a woman who buys a size 40 dress from one designer may not fit in a size 40 garment from another designer. The ministry said the differences sometimes lead women to feel compelled to lose weight.

Are you talking? So what happens when they standardize the size and Ms. Size 40, is now like a "standard" size 45?

Quote:
The agreement also stipulates that European size 46 no longer be specifically labeled as a larger size.

Oh, heaven forbid a size 46 not be "normal" Just because everyone is fat, doesn't suddenly make a large size a regular. It's like when mydonalds stopped offering Small fries, and only had Regular, Large, and Supersize. Ordernig a regular isn't suddenly ordering a small size. It's still just as big as before. People just feel better because their ordering the, "Smallest size avail."

Quote:
As part of the effort to standardize sizes, the ministry plans to measure 8,500 Spanish girls and women between the ages of 12 and 70 to determine the true shapes of Spanish women's bodies.

Latin and Hispanic women are on average, overweight. Just cuz the "true shape" of a culture's body is obese, shouldn't make it acceptable.

http://www.dhs.ca.gov/cdic/copi/html/problem.htm
Body Mass Index by Race/Ethnicity in California Race/Ethnicity Body Mass Index Over 25.0
Source: California Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey, 2004
African American 70.4%
Latino/Hispanic 69.6%
Other 40.4%
White 53%

Yeh the survey was in 2004 and in America, but considering obesity trends, more people are probably obese now, than 3 years ago. And this survey if probably reflective of other developed nations, where healthy food is expensive, and food thats bad for you, is cheap.

Just because populations are obese, shouldn't make it suddenly acceptable to be obese. Movements like these are so stupid. And just a reflection of how fat modern culture is getting.
 

kaliraksha

Well-known member
Re: Are you talking?

size 46 would be a size 16... and Spanish women are European?

I like that they are doing this.... I think it may not be perfect but it's a great improvement

Nothing wrong with being skinny or curvy if you're healthy is the message I see.
 

Raerae

Well-known member
Re: Are you talking?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shimmer
This particular horse has already been beaten to smithereens upon dying.

Feel free to not post in it, i doubt we'll miss the dialogue.
 

Raerae

Well-known member
Re: Are you talking?

size 46 would be a size 16... and Spanish women are European?
Yeh from Spain i believe.

Quote:
I like that they are doing this.... I think it may not be perfect but it's a great improvement

It's such a cop out thought. Why can't people just take responsibilty for their own actions instead of projecting it on everything and everyone else.

Movements like these just reek of the same BS that "political correctness" does. Oh, dont use skinny manequins, we might offend the non skinny people! And make then feel bad about their size!

Beauty is not being average.
 

hyperRealGurl

Well-known member
Re: Are you talking?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raerae
Feel free to not post in it, i doubt we'll miss the dialogue.


^ That comment was uncalled for...

Please refer to Specktra's TOS Section (10) (12)

Thank You
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top