Quote:
Originally Posted by Shimmer
Obviously being poor and rurally located means people are incapable of intelligent or rational thought. My mistake.
|
Believing in religion isn't about not having intelligent rational thought. As many of the pro religion posts in this thread illustrate, which are both rational and intelligent. Not sure where you picked that up from. As I never said religious individuals are dumb or irrational. I just merely pointed out that typically, the less you have, the more apt you are to believe in something that promises more.
Quote:
Honestly, you can take the word and skew it anyway you like. As you quote chapter and verse to conform to your lack of beliefs, I assure you I can find, quote, and provide chapter and verse as to both why your beliefs are "wrong" and why mine are "right". That's with any subject though. Data is easily manipulated. |
Where did I quote chapters of the bible in my post to say I dont believe? I've only quoted a section of the bible that explains why God was jealous in a previous post. And my interpretation of why he would be described that way. I never mentioned anything about my opinion on religion in that post.
Quote:
You'd be surprised how many quietly wealthy families have steadfast faith, but that d oesn't matter because you've chosen your path. |
I never said wealthy families dont have faith. I said that organized religion loses it's appeal. The Catholic Church has lost a lot of influence in the United States, and other developed countries, it doesn't mean that less people believe in Jesus, or the Bible. I'm surprised Shimmer, usually you read closer than that.
Quote:
You've set yourself out to say "This is it. I'm right, you're wrong, no one else who contradicts my perspective has an iota of credibility." |
It's up to the supporting party to present points as to why their opinion/belief/whatever is correct, not for the opposition party to do it for them.
Quote:
That's your approach to these subjects. Which is why, though your points could be fleshed out and somewhat interesting, they're not. You're not attempting to debate and see the other side's perspective. |
Actually I'll have to disagree with you on this point adamantly. All things considered, the community here on specktra is extremely varied, and vocal about their beliefs, and many are very willing to defend those beliefs. You dont learn about other people by having the same opinion. You learn about people by questioning their beliefs and opinions and having them defend those beliefs.
A prosecution lawyer doesn't win a case by agreeing with the defense, in the same way, the defense doesn't defend their client by agreeing with the prosecution. While on a subject like faith, you might not be able to change my opinion, i do enjoy learning about why other people have faith.
The problem is, when people are afraid to defend their beliefs, because they are afraid to have someone question them. People dont have to change their opinion on a subject for a thread to be successful. As long as people are learing about why people have their opinions, I think the discussion overall is positive. Opinions dont change overnight, but they do change over time as you learn more about someone or a topic.
Quote:
It's not my job, nor any other Christian's job, to shove Christianity or any other religion down your throat. |
Many do though. The fact that there is only one "legit" way to get to "heaven" is essentially shoving organized religion down my throat as you so eloquently stated. As a result there really can't be any compromise on a subject like this, because organized religion is unable to compromise, because it can't compromise. Religion/Faith is Black or White. You eigther believe in Jesus as your savior, and follow the bible as it's interpreted by the church, or you go to hell. There is no middle groud, no compromise, no willingness to bend. Organized religion loses power if there is compromise.
Quote:
It's unreasonable to you that there are certain standards one must be held to to have faith, but it's stated quite clearly several times in the NT. |
The NT as interpreted by who? The Church, or by me?
Quote:
You've been given the information, you've decided what to do with it. Arguing it with me is only a manner of seeking validation that you're right.
*shrug* |
I've never said I was right, I'm simply offering a different interpretation. The fact alone that there are so MANY different interpretations/versions of the bible, clearly shows that there is more than one way into heaven.
Quote:
The topic could be interesting, but posts like this aren't what makes it interesting, because posts like this only highlight that your thought process isn't one of discovery and education, but one of proving you're right. |
Actually, my opinion is probably the only flexible one in the thread. In fact it's the only one that can be. Because as you already said, the NT clearly states there is only one way, so as a adamant believer, you can't keep your faith, while having a flexible opinion, because organized religion isn't flexible.