Originally Posted by Classic Beauty As a sixteen year old, I am tired of people stereotyping teenagers as foolish, dim-witted, and judgemental. Please, stop the hate. Belive it or not, most of us respect our elders. |
Originally Posted by Cruella Turbokittykat, will you marry me? In fact, how about all us "older" chicks get together and have a big, ol' luv fest? |
Originally Posted by barbie_doll_713 ...I honestly think MAC should stick to it's target group. Which is like teens-30s. |
Originally Posted by rouquinne really? if that were true, then why wouldn't Lauder drop MAC's driving motto when they bought the company - or now? why would they get 3 women in their 60s to act as ICONS??? your loss. you have a crystal ball??? the Icon series products sell out. have you seen what people are asking for Liza PM palettes? MOST older women? how many have you surveyed? at the last 3 MAC seminars i attended, the over 35s out-numbered the under 30s. i've been wearing MAC since the company started, are you suggesting that i should stop wearing product i love because i'm too old????? EL's colours are chalky and Lancome has limited range of stuff and they still don't make decent foundation! if it didn't work from a marketing perspective, do you think the company would do it??? "older" women are a consumer force to be reckoned with these days! |
Originally Posted by sigwing What's wrong with being in your 30's? I'd totally missed this ridiculous thread till now. I echo Rouquinne's comments. It's great that some kids get to spend $500 a month, plus their parents income!, on makeup and get to post at websites like that makes them special and someone to be bowed down to by some of us who might even be over 40. (cough cough) I can't believe some of the condescending remarks like "older" women have "spunk" because they like to buy whatever makeup brand. I bought Mary Quant in my teens, Clinique and Lancome in my 20's & 30's, along with EL sometimes, and several others. I make three times as much money now as I did then, and I buy an assortment of things, but prefer MAC eyeshadows. So what. I didn't know there were age categories or requirements, or judgmental kids looking down their noses at me and laughing at me behind my back for it. Thanks for enlightening me. I've got some great MA's that are genuine women who don't do that, I would bet on it, and I'd guess laugh more at the teenager coming in with her mom trying to pick out what eyeshadow to get, taking a bunch of time to get just the right one and make the big decision, and my MA can wait on me in the meantime and I pick up several e/s and various other items and she checks me out while the little girl finally decides on a pot of "Hush." This Catherine collection looks wonderful, and I don't understand the comments about her age, etc., because as soon as everyone gets their hauls of it, they'll forget her and go on to the next collection or wondering what is coming out next that they can look forward to. As far as "young" models or whatever, I'd agree with the Angelina or Gwen, but Paris Hilton? You've got to be kidding. I guess if you want to iconize someone who is only famous because they market themself, they are "lucky" enough to have been born into a billionaire family and they can afford to make their own perfume....then while I might consider that a weird sort of person to admire, what do I know....I'm old and apparently have different values. I've posted here at this website because I've ALWAYS loved cosmetics and collected makeup, discovered MAC several years ago & have thoroughly enjoyed it & found a lot of "enthusiasts" here, but hadn't felt offended by any kind of age-related prejudice or snobbery until I read this thread. I'm going to have to be more selective if I ever come back and click on anything to read again. There are a lot of nice people here, I've thought so far, but maybe it is silly for someone my age trying to join in what I thought was a community of women from all over the world, all ages, races, etc. I can assure you, though, I do not buy MAC or anything else to try to be "young." |
Originally Posted by Turbokittykat OK barbie_doll_713, this is the last time I’m going to address you because I know it’s pointless. You are just too young to fully understand the retail market you are trying to talk about and you’re too young to be able to participate properly in a sensible debate. You're already quite certain you know how it is. I’m going to try very hard not to be sarcastic and condescending, although that’s quite difficult because you’re just so wrong, and so convinced you’re right. Still, having been 16 myself once, I remember that I thought I knew everything at that age too. Firstly, I’m not bitter, I’m just totally incredulous that someone with so little knowledge of the MAC ethos, their market and their marketing strategy would be talking with such certainty, and refusing to take note of what anyone else has said. I suggested you ask a MAC MA to back up what I said about a large proportion of MACs business coming from customers who want neutral or subtle looks. You didn’t bother, you just dismissed it as “wrong” on the basis that you have “worked at Macy’s”. You may well have worked at Macy’s but you have not worked for MAC. I know that for a fact because you are too young. The following is a comment posted very recently on the Live Journal mac_cosmetics group by a current MAC MA. She’s talking about the Catherine Devenue collection. ” the majority of MAC users don't wear bright shadows. Sure there's a bunch of us who do, and yes, that's what MAC is known for . . . but as a MAC artist, I'd say that 75% of the people that come in are scared by the likes of Electric Eel, SUshi Flower etc. Also, the collection is supposed to reflect the Icon. Catherine Deneuve isn't someone most of us (in this community) ever even heard of. She's of a different generation. And actually, I think it's a great idea to have something more geared towards older women. I myself was a bit disappointed in the Holiday shadow sets this year, because I don't feel that there's something for everyone. The cool palette is the only one anyone over the age of 50 has even looked at. Yes, older women can wear color, but it's not how they were raised and not something they feel comfortable in. NE flew off the shelves with that demographic. They can get away with more muted tones. I don't know. I like that MAC finally has an icon for more mature women. Almost every other collection is geared towards people like us.” I’ve seen the same said by several other MAC MAs and the girls who work at my local MAC counter say exactly the same thing. If you actually ask someone who works for MAC you’ll find that bright colours do not makeup the bulk of MAC sales and that MAC already has a customer base of more mature people. I see them myself, browsing at the counter almost every time I go there. It may well be rare in your city, (although at 16 I doubt I would have noticed who else was shopping in a store because I was usually thinking more about what I wanted), however the majority of MAC MAs will tell you, it’s not rare in most other locations. There was a MAC MA on LJ a little while ago who was complaining that at her counter people only ever wanted brown eye shadow. She wanted to ask for a transfer to a different area so she could do makeovers with some of the brighter colours occasionally! If I had the spare time, and if I thought it would do any good at all, I would go and find some of her posts. As for your assertion that younger customers will not buy much from this collection, (and I don’t see why they wouldn’t – a pink lipglass is a pink lipglass, as someone has already said), even if you are correct, your claim that MAC will lose customers over it is not correct. They will be right back for the next collection, which, knowing MAC, will be out 2 weeks after the Icon collection. You’ve said yourself, if someone wants bright, edgy colours, they go to MAC. So where else are they going to go? It’s highly unlikely that a large proportion of the younger customers are going to find somewhere else to get their fix of brights in the short space of time before MAC brings out the next collection. MAC knows full well that they’re not going to lose you, you’ll all be back. And in the meantime, the Icon collection will sell to the more mature customers. I know you’re not hating older women, you’re just not understanding them at all, and at 16 that’s not particularly surprising. Still, I already know from what you’ve written so far that you will not accept a word of this and that you are 100% convinced that you know exactly how the world works. I’d hope you will at least think about what I’ve said though. I’d love to be able to show this to you when you are 50 and see what you think then! |
Originally Posted by bluegrassbabe Paris Hilton as an Icon? A glorified porn star who speaks in 2 word sentences? She is disgusting. That would be the day I threw every MAC product I owned in the garbage can. |
Originally Posted by Turbokittykat I don't hate teenagers at all and I'm sorry you feel that's the case. I've nothing against you, or most young people. My issue on this thread was with one particular individual who has taken it upon herself to inform us that MAC "belongs" to the teenage market and to lecture the rest of us about marketing and the MAC target sales group; subjects she clearly knows very little about. My comments on her age were to do with me trying to make allowances for her because she's young and she hasn't yet realised she doesn't know everything, not because I think that every teenager is the same. Also, I don't remember calling her foolish or dim-witted, and if pushed I think I would have been more likely to use the words inexperienced, immature and unwilling to consider any other view than her own. She's shown quite clearly that she does not realise she doesn't know it all, that she cannot back-up her own arguments with anything other than guesswork and her opinion, and that she's not willing to listen to and take on board anything anyone else has to say, and in doing that she lost my respect. |
Originally Posted by MeganGMcD What is really funny is if you look at the demographics for make-up. The 30+ are the people who buy the most. Also, if a young girl cannot see something of value in a woman who was a MUSE for Christian Dior...than she really needs to rethink some things! |
**Just like ya'll wouldn't dream of wearing colors promoted by Paris Hilton, I couldn't dream of wearing colors promoted by a 60 year old!!!** |
Originally Posted by barbie_doll_713 I'm not saying I'm right, but my God I hope you don't think you are. |
Originally Posted by barbie_doll_713 And for you to say I can't participate in a debate is just insulting. |
Originally Posted by sigwing um....doesn't one of the quads have 3 colors that are perm, and the other one has one that is? Are ya going to throw them away if you have them already....because some "old lady" is now part of the promotion that includes some shades that are staples? I can't even begin to respond to the post above this reply box....it's absolutely ridiculous. But that's the beauty of the web....a kid who lives at home arguing and getting to lord over and insult anonymous women who are "mature" and have careers. It's crazy....but I've even gotten in arguments with our town's garbage collector, too. Oh, and congrats to you again on your gig with the 'rents......beats what I do for a living. Mine probably wouldn't want me to move in & let them support me & pay for my makeup now, tho. Damn. I will mention I haven't seen, or even been acquainted with, any women over 40 who try to "look like they're 20," whatever that would be. |
Originally Posted by barbie_doll_713 Alright, I see that my opinion is not the popular opinion. I was mistaken, I didn't realize there were so many older (or mature as you might like me to say) women here on Spektra. I am VERY sorry if I have offended anyone. I'm just saying that to younger people this collection will not be a must-have. **Just like ya'll wouldn't dream of wearing colors promoted by Paris Hilton, I couldn't dream of wearing colors promoted by a 60 year old!!!** !!*** |
Originally Posted by Turbokittykat At least I can back my comments and opinions up with some actual substance, such as a direct, relevant quote from an actual MAC employee, which you have conveniently chosen to ignore because it does not fit in with what you believe to be true. Your 'this is what I believe and if you disagree I'll just say you're wrong without any justification or further discussion' attitude shows your immaturity very clearly. I didn't say you couldn't, I said you're incapable of doing so in an adult way, (i.e. with reasoning, as mentioned above). I know I said I wasn't going to respond to you again, but I'm bashing my head against a brick wall in the hope you'll actually grasp what I mean by a reasoned debate eventually. Let me try an example... I stated that MAC sell more subtle colours than they do bright colours. Your very mature response was to state outright that I am "wrong", (go back and read your response if you don't believe me). So I posted some justification, (the direct quote from a MAC MA). You've conveniently chosen to ignore this. The fact is, I'm not "wrong". My statement comes from actually talking to a number of people who work for MAC, and attending a few seminars, (as with the other poster who commented, at every seminar or event I've attended the number of 30+ women has VASTLY outweighed the number of under 30s there). I've backed up my statements, whereas you have stated, "this is how it is because I say so". You're stating your opinions as if they are facts with absolutely no supporting information. You commented earlier more than once stating something like "most older women" are intimidated by MAC. You were asked how many you had surveyed, and again you chose to ignore it. You can't expect things you state as fact to be taken seriously if you can't back them up at all! Something your mum may have said does not give you grounds to spout on about how "most older women" feel. And you're still doing it, for example "When you think of MAC you think of a young hip girl, not a 60year old women". YOU might think of a young, hip girl (probably because that's all you can relate to) but that doesn't mean that's what everyone thinks of. I certainly don't. Surely the number of people disagreeing with you here is telling you something. And whatever you think, it's not because we're insulted that you can't relate to a 60 year old, or whatever, it's because we think your statements of how things are are flawed. And no, referring to you is not the same as directing a comment at you. Just in case you are unclear, this is a comment to you, although I really don't know why I am bothering. I guess I'd just like to see you grasp the concept that your opinions are not fact just because you say so! |
Originally Posted by Viva_la_MAC_Girl Ok, let me ask you this in all fairness - I see that your a BIG fan of Marylin Monroe - ( and she was "older") tell me if MAC launched her as an ICON - would you buy it? |