MAC - Sonic Chic Discussion

[MAC_Whore]

Re: MAC Cosmetics Sonic Chic Discussion

Really, these are probably just mini MSFs in darker or more blush-oriented shades. What do most of us use a lot of the MSFs for anyways? As a blush. The formula on these will most likely be the same as all other MSFs. I am sure they will give more of a flushed, glow of colour that is subtle and buildable whereas the BP blushes were a bit more pigmented. That's my guess.

Even though a lot of the MSF Blush descriptions sound similar to the BP Blushes, they will be a whole different formula, so you will most likely get different colour payoff and results.

 

[Susanne]

Re: MAC Cosmetics Sonic Chic Discussion

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAC_Whore Really, these are probably just mini MSFs in darker or more blush-oriented shades. What do most of us use a lot of the MSFs for anyways? As a blush. The formula on these will most likely be the same as all other MSFs.

 

[elegant-one]

Re: MAC Cosmetics Sonic Chic Discussion

Quote:

Originally Posted by thelove4tequila Whoever didn't get the chance to get the 181se with Novel Twist last year, don't miss out this time!! I just love mine! Def not as soft as my 182 but I looove the size! Anyways those blushes look amazing! I want to get about 2-3!

Yes, I have that its really nice...but ya, it could be softer. The size is perfect!

 

[kiss]

Re: MAC Cosmetics Sonic Chic Discussion

I noticed that the top flap is not clear but black...I am very excited about these but I wish their texture would be a silky smooth mineralize texture and not the chalky-glittery mineralize ones...

 

[sleepyhead]

Re: MAC Cosmetics Sonic Chic Discussion

Quote:

Originally Posted by kiss I noticed that the top flap is not clear but black...I am very excited about these but I wish their texture would be a silky smooth mineralize texture and not the chalky-glittery mineralize ones...

i think it might be the pictures though. you can kinda see the mac logo on the lid. and i really don't think they would put a backward mac logo on the inside of an opaque lid

 

[metalkitty]

Re: MAC Cosmetics Sonic Chic Discussion

Quote:

Originally Posted by kiss I noticed that the top flap is not clear but black...I am very excited about these but I wish their texture would be a silky smooth mineralize texture and not the chalky-glittery mineralize ones...

I agree with the last comment about them hopefully not being glitter bombs with no color payoff. Actually I take that back, I hope just a few really are glitter bombs so I can save me precious booty (aaargh!). I've been waiting for mac to come out with mineralize blushes so I'm a happy camper as long as I can get my mitts on some of these. Too bad they come out a month after my birthday....

 

[erine1881]

Re: MAC Cosmetics Sonic Chic Discussion

Quote:

Originally Posted by kiss I noticed that the top flap is not clear but black...I am very excited about these but I wish their texture would be a silky smooth mineralize texture and not the chalky-glittery mineralize ones...

the lids will be clear. they're only black in the pics cause the background is black.

 

[kiss]

Re: MAC Cosmetics Sonic Chic Discussion

cool, I wanted the lids to be clear so I can stare at them on my shelf as I walk by. I do that with my other mineralized products. haha.

 

[ewlialovesme]

Re: MAC Cosmetics Sonic Chic Discussion

Oooh, yes. I could be very tempted by these. Especially the raspberry with gold pearl one.

 

[Karen_B]

Re: MAC Cosmetics Sonic Chic Discussion

I am so glad I'll have more money this summer, so I'll be able to afford some of these! Anyone know when this collection will be out more precisely?

 

[juicyaddict]

Re: MAC Cosmetics Sonic Chic Discussion

these got me excited. i can't wait to see these in person.

 

[MisaMayah]

Re: MAC Cosmetics Sonic Chic Discussion

Limitations are serious this year with all the collections coming out!!
My list:
Nuance
Gentle
Love Thing
Love Joy

Yep I hope there's no chunky glitter bits!!

 

[glamqueen1]

Re: MAC Cosmetics Sonic Chic Discussion

This text is from Bjooti.net :
"Mineralize Blush to break the style barrier: Screamingly chic, but soft, sheer, lightweight. Build continuous colour in superfine pearl with a soft shimmer. Enhance cheekbones, create planes and contours with the greatest of ease, in breakthrough baked particles applied with a quick, dome-tipped buffer brush. The fastest route to perfection yet is Ultra-Sonic."
superfine pearl with soft shimmer is just right up my alley! I hope, hope, hope, they will be just as gorgeous as Light Flush!

 

[Susanne]

Re: MAC Cosmetics Sonic Chic Discussion

Quote:

Originally Posted by elegant-one Yes, I have that its really nice...but ya, it could be softer. The size is perfect!

Oh, can you tell me how the size is? Compared to the 182? Do I need it? I have a 182-like brush.

 

[AudreyNicole]

Re: MAC Cosmetics Sonic Chic Discussion

Quote:

Originally Posted by Susanne Oh, can you tell me how the size is? Compared to the 182? Do I need it? I have a 182-like brush.

Here is great comparison picture of the regular 182 and the 181se. It is adorable and I definately want it!

Post #18

http://specktra.net/f217/mac-novel-t...-2007-a-69738/

 

[Susanne]

Re: MAC Cosmetics Sonic Chic Discussion

Quote:

Originally Posted by AudreyNicole Here is great comparison picture of the regular 182 and the 181se. It is adorable and I definately want it! Post #18 http://specktra.net/f217/mac-novel-t...-2007-a-69738/

Oh, just fallen in love with this brush!

Thanks Audrey!

 

[Ladyvirtuous]

Re: MAC Cosmetics Sonic Chic Discussion

I'm all late............LOL.

By looking at those pics, the only ones I think will look good on me (NC44) are Nuance, Pleasantry, Gleeful and Warm Soul.

I am totally in love with Nuance!!

 

[elegant-one]

Re: MAC Cosmetics Sonic Chic Discussion

Quote:

Originally Posted by Susanne Oh, can you tell me how the size is? Compared to the 182? Do I need it? I have a 182-like brush.

sorry..just got back

Well, I don't know if you need it

but it is a really nice size..not too big & not too small. Its perfect for contouring, or a light blush appl. Its not super soft though, but not rough or anything like that. I like mine

 

[xoxprincessx0x]

Re: MAC Cosmetics Sonic Chic Discussion

omg im so so so excited!!!! i have to go to the store and see these in person because i feel a lot of colros may be similar to my BPB's. Ughh its so hard to resist new products though.

 

[Winthrop44]

Re: MAC Cosmetics Sonic Chic Discussion

Quote:

Originally Posted by Susanne Oh, can you tell me how the size is? Compared to the 182? Do I need it? I have a 182-like brush.

Don't shoot me for this fellow Bimbos, but if you want a super soft kabuki that comes in 2 sizes I would check out Aromaleigh:

Brushes for Mineral Makeup