Re: 2008 Presisdential election - poll
Quote:
Originally Posted by TamiChoi
My excuse is:
a better life and CHANGE for both minorities and caucasians.
I'll be damned if Sarah Palin was the next pres.
edited... it's not an excuse, more of a FACT.
|
just a tidbit to consider.. white women are classified as minorities as well. They are protected by the very same anti-discrimination laws that protect the rights of other 'minority groups'. I thought it quite ironic that the whole 'equal pay for equal work' legislation and the candidates positions on that legislation wasn't more of an issue in this campaign.
But I agree wholeheartedly Mccain would have had a better chance if he
1. Didn't choose Sarah Palin as a running mate
2. Opposed the 'Wallstreet bailout'
3. Showed more of a steady hand in his attempts to deal with the bailout
But hey it isn't over right... we could wake up on Wed. morning and have a Mccain presidency.. it's possible
But Just an FYI.
"We have not done enough. And I'm committed to making sure that there's equal pay for equal work. That there is equal opportunity in every aspect of our society. And that is my record and you can count on it."
--John McCain, Town Hall meeting, Hudson, WI, July 11, 2008.
John McCain claimed today that he is determined to ensure "equal pay for equal work." But women's groups were quick to point out that the presumptive Republican nominee has announced his opposition to the
Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act which seeks to do exactly that. The Arizona senator believes that the measure would "only serve to fatten the pockets of trial lawyers."
The Facts
Lilly Ledbetter was a Goodyear Tire employee who sued the company in 1998 after finding out that she was earning 40 percent less than male co-workers employed to do similar jobs. A federal judge in Birmingham, Ala, awarded her $360,000 in back pay, but the verdict was overturned on appeal. In May 2007, the Supreme Court
ruled against Ledbetter in a 5-4 verdict. The justices ruled that employees who believe they have been discriminated against must file a complaint within 180 days with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
The Ledbetter bill, which passed the House last year and is now languishing before the Senate, removes the 180-day deadline. Supporters of the bill claim that it is usually impractical to file a complaint within 180 days as most companies are very secretive about salary data, and it can take years to establish a pattern of discrimination.
Back in April, McCain
told reporters that he was "all in favor of equal pay" for women, but that there were better ways to help women find higher paying jobs. "They need the education and training, particularly since more and more women are heads of their households," he explained.
Asked to provide support for the senator's claim that he is committed to ensuring "equal pay for equal work," the McCain campaign cited several pieces of legislation that he has supported including the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act of 1989, which prohibits discrimination against older workers, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993. However, none of these measures directly addresses the Ledbetter situation.
McCain spokesman Brian Rogers said that the Ledbetter would "flood our already over-burdened court system and burden employers, who will have no choice but to charge consumers more for goods and services in order to pay for the swarm of new lawsuits that will only serve to fatten the pockets of trial lawyers."
The Pinocchio Test
The presumptive Republican nominee for president says that he is in favor of equal pay for equal work, but has yet to propose legislation that would achieve that goal. To oppose the Ledbetter act on the grounds that it will lead to a "swarm of new lawsuits," is fair enough, but John McCain has not proposed a realistic alternative.